Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 823

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Trial of Short- Versus Long-Course Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases

Hartsell, William F., Scott, Charles B., Bruner, Deborah Watkins, Scarantino, Charles W., Ivker, Robert A., Roach, Mack, Suh, John H., Demas, William F., Movsas, Benjamin, Petersen, Ivy A., Konski, Andre A., Cleeland, Charles S., Janjan, Nora A., DeSilvio, Michelle·2005·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy is effective in palliating pain from bone metastases. We investigated whether 8 Gy delivered in a single treatment fraction provides pain and narcotic relief that is equivalent to that of the standard treatment course of 30 Gy delivered in 10 treatment fractions over 2 weeks. METHODS: A prospective, phase III randomized study of palliative radiation therapy was conducted for patients with breast or prostate cancer who had one to three sites of painful bone metastases and moderate to severe pain. Patients were randomly assigned to 8 Gy in one treatment fraction (8-Gy arm) or to 30 Gy in 10 treatment fractions (30-Gy arm). Pain relief at 3 months after randomization was evaluated with the Brief Pain Inventory. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to compare response to treatment in terms of pain and narcotic relief between the two arms and for each stratification variable. All statistical comparisons were two-sided. RESULTS: There were 455 patients in the 8-Gy arm and 443 in the 30-Gy arm; pretreatment characteristics were equally balanced between arms. Grade 2-4 acute toxicity was more frequent in the 30-Gy arm (17%) than in the 8-Gy arm (10%) (difference = 7%, 95% CI = 3% to 12%; P = .002). Late toxicity was rare (4%) in both arms. The overall response rate was 66%. Complete and partial response rates were 15% and 50%, respectively, in the 8-Gy arm compared with 18% and 48% in the 30-Gy arm (P = .6). At 3 months, 33% of all patients no longer required narcotic medications. The incidence of subsequent pathologic fracture was 5% for the 8-Gy arm and 4% for the 30-Gy arm. The retreatment rate was statistically significantly higher in the 8-Gy arm (18%) than in the 30-Gy arm (9%) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Both regimens were equivalent in terms of pain and narcotic relief at 3 months and were well tolerated with few adverse effects. The 8-Gy arm had a higher rate of re-treatment but had less acute toxicity than the 30-Gy arm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/dji139

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 823

Metadata

Authors
Hartsell, W. F., Scott, C. B., Bruner, D. W., Scarantino, C. W., Ivker, R. A., Roach, M., Suh, J. H., Demas, W. F., Movsas, B., Petersen, I. A., Konski, A. A., Cleeland, C. S., Janjan, N. A., & DeSilvio, M.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
97
Issue
11
Pages
798-804
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2019582591
Cited by
823
References
3
FWCI
29.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Trial of Short- Versus Long-Course Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/dji139
The paper
Hartsell, W. F., Scott, C. B., Bruner, D. W., Scarantino, C. W., Ivker, R. A., Roach, M., Suh, J. H., Demas, W. F., Movsas, B., Petersen, I. A., Konski, A. A., Cleeland, C. S., Janjan, N. A., & DeSilvio, M. (2005). Randomized Trial of Short- Versus Long-Course Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji139

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.