The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitation of Promoter Methylation of Multiple Genes in Urine DNA and Bladder Cancer Detection
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The noninvasive identification of bladder tumors may improve disease control and prevent disease progression. Aberrant promoter methylation (i.e., hypermethylation) is a major mechanism for silencing tumor suppressor genes and other cancer-associated genes in many human cancers, including bladder cancer. METHODS: A quantitative fluorogenic real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was used to examine primary tumor DNA and urine sediment DNA from 15 patients with bladder cancer and 25 control subjects for promoter hypermethylation of nine genes (APC, ARF, CDH1, GSTP1, MGMT, CDKN2A, RARbeta2, RASSF1A, and TIMP3) to identify potential biomarkers for bladder cancer. We then used these markers to examine urine sediment DNA samples from an additional 160 patients with bladder cancers of various stages and grades and from an additional 69 age-matched control subjects. Data were analyzed on the basis of a prediction model and were internally validated using a jacknife procedure. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: For all 15 patients with paired DNA samples, the promoter methylation pattern in urine matched that in the primary tumors. Four genes displayed 100% specificity. Of the 175 bladder cancer patients, 121 (69%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 62% to 76%) displayed promoter methylation in at least one of these genes (CDKN2A, ARF, MGMT, and GSTP1), whereas all control subjects were negative for such methylation (100% specificity, 95% CI = 96% to 100%). A logistic prediction model using the methylation levels of all remaining five genes was developed and internally validated for subjects who were negative on the four-gene panel. This combined, two-stage predictor produced an internally validated ROC curve with an overall sensitivity of 82% (95% CI = 75 % to 87%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI = 90% to 99%). CONCLUSION: Testing a small panel of genes with the quantitative methylation-specific PCR assay in urine sediment DNA is a powerful noninvasive approach for the detection of bladder cancer. Larger independent confirmatory cohorts with longitudinal follow-up will be required in future studies to define the impact of this technology on early detection, prognosis, and disease monitoring before clinical application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The essentials of DNA methylation
Bird, A. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90526-i · Cited by 948
Cited by
DNA Methylation: a form of epigenetic control of gene expression
Lim, D. H. K., & Maher, E. R. (2010) · The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist · doi:10.1576/toag.12.1.037.27556 · Cited by 155
Buganim, Y., Solomon, H., Rais, Y., Kistner, D., Nachmany, I., Brait, M., Madar, S., Goldstein, I., Kalo, E., Adam, N., et al. (2010) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-2661 · Cited by 77
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoque, M. O., Begum, S., Topaloglu, O., Chatterjee, A., Rosenbaum, E., Van Criekinge, W., Westra, W. H., Schoenberg, M., Zahurak, M., Goodman, S. N., & Sidransky, D.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-07-19
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 996-1004
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2170358006
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitation of Promoter Methylation of Multiple Genes in Urine DNA and Bladder Cancer Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djj265
- The paper
- Hoque, M. O., Begum, S., Topaloglu, O., Chatterjee, A., Rosenbaum, E., Van Criekinge, W., Westra, W. H., Schoenberg, M., Zahurak, M., Goodman, S. N., & Sidransky, D. (2006). Quantitation of Promoter Methylation of Multiple Genes in Urine DNA and Bladder Cancer Detection. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.