Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving Penetration in Tumors With Nanoassemblies of Phospholipids and Doxorubicin

Open access
Tang, N., Du, G., Wang, N., Liu, C., Hang, H., Liang, W.·2007·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drug delivery and penetration into neoplastic cells distant from tumor vessels is critical for the effectiveness of solid tumor chemotherapy. We hypothesized that 10- to 20-nm nanoassemblies of phospholipids containing doxorubicin would improve the drug's penetration, accumulation, and antitumor activity. METHODS: Doxorubicin was incorporated into polyethylene glycol-phosphatidylethanolamine (PEG-PE) block copolymer micelles by a self-assembly procedure to form nanoassemblies of doxorubicin and PEG-PE. In vitro cytotoxicity of micelle-encapsulated doxorubicin (M-Dox) against A549 human non-small-cell lung carcinoma cells was examined using the methylthiazoletetrazolium assay, and confocal microscopy, total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry were used to examine intracellular distribution and the cellular uptake mechanism. C57Bl/6 mice (n = 10-40 per group) bearing subcutaneous or pulmonary Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) tumors were treated with M-Dox or free doxorubicin, and tumor growth, doxorubicin pharmacokinetics, and mortality were compared. Toxicity was analyzed in tumor-free mice. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Encapsulation of doxorubicin in PEG-PE micelles increased its internalization by A549 cells into lysosomes and enhanced cytotoxicity. Drug-encapsulated doxorubicin was more effective in inhibiting tumor growth in the subcutaneous LLC tumor model (mean tumor volumes in mice treated with 5 mg/kg M-Dox = 1126 mm3 and in control mice = 3693 mm3, difference = 2567 mm3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2190 to 2943 mm3, P<.001) than free doxorubicin (mean tumor volumes in doxorubicin-treated mice = 3021 mm3 and in control mice = 3693 mm3, difference = 672 mm3, 95% CI = 296 to 1049 mm3, P = .0332, Wilcoxon signed rank test). M-Dox treatment prolonged survival in both mouse models and reduced metastases in the pulmonary model; it also reduced toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a novel PEG-PE-based nanocarrier of doxorubicin that increased cytotoxicity in vitro and enhanced antitumor activity in vivo with low systemic toxicity. This drug packaging technology may provide a new strategy for design of cancer therapies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djm027

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Tang, N., Du, G., Wang, N., Liu, C., Hang, H., & Liang, W.
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2007-06-27
Volume
99
Issue
13
Pages
1004-1015
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2105547623
Cited by
239
References
7
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Penetration in Tumors With Nanoassemblies of Phospholipids and Doxorubicin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djm027
The paper
Tang, N., Du, G., Wang, N., Liu, C., Hang, H., & Liang, W. (2007). Improving Penetration in Tumors With Nanoassemblies of Phospholipids and Doxorubicin. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djm027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.