The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HER2 Status and Efficacy of Adjuvant Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclines improves disease-free and overall survival compared with non-anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of early breast cancer. The role of HER2 status as a marker of anthracycline responsiveness has been explored by subset analyses within randomized clinical trials, with inconsistent results. We performed a pooled analysis of the interaction between HER2 status and the efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines based on the published subset data. METHODS: We searched literature databases to identify randomized trials that compared anthracycline-based with non-anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of early breast cancer and reported efficacy data according to HER2 status. Log hazard ratios (HRs) for disease-free and overall survival were pooled across the studies according to HER2 status by inverse variance weighting. A pooled test for treatment by HER2 status interaction was performed by weighted linear meta-regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Eight studies (with 6564 randomly assigned patients, of whom 5354 had HER2 status information available) were eligible for this analysis. In HER2-positive disease (n = 1536 patients), anthracyclines were superior to non-anthracycline-based regimens in terms of disease-free (pooled HR of relapse = 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.61 to 0.83; P < .001) and overall (pooled HR of death from any cause = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.85; P < .001) survival. In HER2-negative disease (n = 3818 patients), anthracyclines did not improve disease-free (HR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.11; P = .75) or overall (HR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.92 to 1.16; P = .60) survival. The test for treatment by HER2 status interaction yielded statistically significant results: for disease-free survival, the chi-square statistic for interaction was 13.7 (P < .001), and for overall survival, it was 12.6 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The added benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclines appear to be confined to women who have HER2 overexpressed or amplified breast tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
c-erbB-2 Expression and Response to Adjuvant Therapy in Women with Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer
Muss, H. B., Thor, A. D., Berry, D. A., Kute, T., Liu, E. T., Koerner, F., Cirrincione, C. T., Budman, D. R., Wood, W. C., Barcos, M., et al. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199405053301802 · Cited by 961
A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses
Oxman, A. D., & Guyatt, G. H. (1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-116-1-78 · Cited by 914
Fisher, B., Brown, A. M., Dimitrov, N. V., Poisson, R., Redmond, C., Margolese, R. G., Bowman, D., Wolmark, N., Wickerham, D. L., & Kardinal, C. G. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1990.8.9.1483 · Cited by 620
HER2 and Responsiveness of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Pritchard, K. I., Shepherd, L. E., O'Malley, F. P., Andrulis, I. L., Tu, D., Bramwell, V. H., & Levine, M. N. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa054504 · Cited by 509
Järvinen, T. A. H., Tanner, M., Rantanen, V., Bärlund, M., Borg, Å., Grénman, S., & Isola, J. (2000) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64952-8 · Cited by 387
Knoop, A. S., Knudsen, H., Balslev, E., Rasmussen, B. B., Overgaard, J., Nielsen, K. V., Schonau, A., Gunnarsdóttir, K., Olsen, K. E., Mouridsen, H., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.11.007 · Cited by 320
Paik, S. (2000) · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.24.1991 · Cited by 304
Cited by
Adjuvant Trastuzumab in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
Slamon, D., Eiermann, W., Robert, N., Pienkowski, T., Martin, M., Press, M., Mackey, J., Glaspy, J., Chan, A., Pawlicki, M., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0910383 · Cited by 2,775
Simon, R. (2010) · Personalized Medicine · doi:10.2217/pme.09.49 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Gennari, A., Sormani, M. P., Pronzato, P., Puntoni, M., Colozza, M., Pfeffer, U., & Bruzzi, P.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-01-02
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-20
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2116692581
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HER2 Status and Efficacy of Adjuvant Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djm252
- The paper
- Gennari, A., Sormani, M. P., Pronzato, P., Puntoni, M., Colozza, M., Pfeffer, U., & Bruzzi, P. (2008). HER2 Status and Efficacy of Adjuvant Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djm252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.