Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increased Risk of Recurrence After Hormone Replacement Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors

Open access
Holmberg, L., Iversen, O.-E., Rudenstam, C. M., Hammar, M., Kumpulainen, E., Jaskiewicz, J., Jassem, J., Dobaczewska, D., Fjosne, H. E., Peralta, O., Arriagada, R., Holmqvist, M., Maenpa, J., On behalf of the HABITS Study Group·2008·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hormone replacement therapy (HT) is known to increase the risk of breast cancer in healthy women, but its effect on breast cancer risk in breast cancer survivors is less clear. The randomized HABITS study, which compared HT for menopausal symptoms with best management without hormones among women with previously treated breast cancer, was stopped early due to suspicions of an increased risk of new breast cancer events following HT. We present results after extended follow-up. METHODS: HABITS was a randomized, non-placebo-controlled noninferiority trial that aimed to be at a power of 80% to detect a 36% increase in the hazard ratio (HR) for a new breast cancer event following HT. Cox models were used to estimate relative risks of a breast cancer event, the maximum likelihood method was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and chi(2) tests were used to assess statistical significance, with all P values based on two-sided tests. The absolute risk of a new breast cancer event was estimated with the cumulative incidence function. Most patients who received HT were prescribed continuous combined or sequential estradiol hemihydrate and norethisterone. RESULTS: Of the 447 women randomly assigned, 442 could be followed for a median of 4 years. Thirty-nine of the 221 women in the HT arm and 17 of the 221 women in the control arm experienced a new breast cancer event (HR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.3 to 4.2). Cumulative incidences at 5 years were 22.2% in the HT arm and 8.0% in the control arm. By the end of follow-up, six women in the HT arm had died of breast cancer and six were alive with distant metastases. In the control arm, five women had died of breast cancer and four had metastatic breast cancer (P = .51, log-rank test). CONCLUSION: After extended follow-up, there was a clinically and statistically significant increased risk of a new breast cancer event in survivors who took HT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djn058

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1995, Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2, 3

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Holmberg, L., Iversen, O.-E., Rudenstam, C. M., Hammar, M., Kumpulainen, E., Jaskiewicz, J., Jassem, J., Dobaczewska, D., Fjosne, H. E., Peralta, O., Arriagada, R., Holmqvist, M., Maenpa, J., & On behalf of the HABITS Study Group
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2008-03-25
Volume
100
Issue
7
Pages
475-482
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2101001682
Cited by
344
References
23
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Risk of Recurrence After Hormone Replacement Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djn058
The paper
Holmberg, L., Iversen, O.-E., Rudenstam, C. M., Hammar, M., Kumpulainen, E., Jaskiewicz, J., Jassem, J., Dobaczewska, D., Fjosne, H. E., Peralta, O., Arriagada, R., Holmqvist, M., Maenpa, J., & On behalf of the HABITS Study Group. (2008). Increased Risk of Recurrence After Hormone Replacement Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn058

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.