The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breast Tissue Composition and Susceptibility to Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Breast density, as assessed by mammography, reflects breast tissue composition. Breast epithelium and stroma attenuate x-rays more than fat and thus appear light on mammograms while fat appears dark. In this review, we provide an overview of selected areas of current knowledge about the relationship between breast density and susceptibility to breast cancer. We review the evidence that breast density is a risk factor for breast cancer, the histological and other risk factors that are associated with variations in breast density, and the biological plausibility of the associations with risk of breast cancer. We also discuss the potential for improved risk prediction that might be achieved by using alternative breast imaging methods, such as magnetic resonance or ultrasound. After adjustment for other risk factors, breast density is consistently associated with breast cancer risk, more strongly than most other risk factors for this disease, and extensive breast density may account for a substantial fraction of breast cancer. Breast density is associated with risk of all of the proliferative lesions that are thought to be precursors of breast cancer. Studies of twins have shown that breast density is a highly heritable quantitative trait. Associations between breast density and variations in breast histology, risk of proliferative breast lesions, and risk of breast cancer may be the result of exposures of breast tissue to both mitogens and mutagens. Characterization of breast density by mammography has several limitations, and the uses of breast density in risk prediction and breast cancer prevention may be improved by other methods of imaging, such as magnetic resonance or ultrasound tomography.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gail, M. H., Brinton, L. A., Byar, D. P., Corle, D. K., Green, S. B., Schairer, C., & Mulvihill, J. J. (1989) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879 · Cited by 3,334
Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000
Ford, E. S., Ajani, U. A., Croft, J. B., Critchley, J. A., Labarthe, D. R., Kottke, T. E., Giles, W. H., & Capewell, S. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa053935 · Cited by 2,757
Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer
Boyd, N. F., Guo, H., Martin, L. J., Sun, L., Stone, J., Fishell, E., Jong, R. A., Hislop, G., Chiarelli, A., Minkin, S., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa062790 · Cited by 2,478
Self-citationStromal fibroblasts in cancer initiation and progression
Bhowmick, N. A., Neilson, E. G., & Moses, H. L. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03096 · Cited by 2,302
Simple proton spectroscopic imaging.
Dixon, W. T. (1984) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.153.1.6089263 · Cited by 2,276
Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)
Liberman, L., & Menell, J. H. (2002) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(01)00017-3 · Cited by 2,155
Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis
McCormack, V. A., & dos Santos Silva, I. (2006) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0034 · Cited by 2,143
A tense situation: forcing tumour progression
Butcher, D. T., Alliston, T., & Weaver, V. M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2544 · Cited by 1,940
Chlebowski, R. T., Hendrix, S. L., Langer, R. D., Stefanick, M. L., Gass, M., Lane, D., Rodabough, R. J., Gilligan, M. A., Cyr, M. G., Thomson, C. A., et al. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.24.3243 · Cited by 1,872
Role of oxygen radicals in DNA damage and cancer incidence
Valko, M., Izakovic, M., Mazur, M., Rhodes, C. J., & Telser, J. (2004) · Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1023/b:mcbi.0000049134.69131.89 · Cited by 1,820
Cited by
An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer
Nazari, S. S., & Mukherjee, P. (2018) · Breast Cancer · doi:10.1007/s12282-018-0857-5 · Cited by 298
Contribution of adipose tissue to development of cancer
Cozzo, A. J., Fuller, A. M., & Makowski, L. (2017) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c170008 · Cited by 188
Increased peri‐ductal collagen micro‐organization may contribute to raised mammographic density
McConnell, J. C., O’Connell, O. V., Brennan, K., Weiping, L., Howe, M., Joseph, L., Knight, D., O’Cualain, R., Lim, Y., Leek, A., et al. (2016) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0664-2 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyd, N. F., Martin, L. J., Bronskill, M., Yaffe, M. J., Duric, N., & Minkin, S.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-07-08
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1224-1237
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2147153911
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 99
- FWCI
- 17.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast Tissue Composition and Susceptibility to Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djq239
- The paper
- Boyd, N. F., Martin, L. J., Bronskill, M., Yaffe, M. J., Duric, N., & Minkin, S. (2010). Breast Tissue Composition and Susceptibility to Breast Cancer. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.