The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prostate Cancer Screening in the Randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: Mortality Results after 13 Years of Follow-up
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The prostate component of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial was undertaken to determine whether there is a reduction in prostate cancer mortality from screening using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and digital rectal examination (DRE). Mortality after 7-10 years of follow-up has been reported previously. We report extended follow-up to 13 years after the trial. METHODS: A total of 76 685 men, aged 55-74 years, were enrolled at 10 screening centers between November 1993 and July 2001 and randomly assigned to the intervention (organized screening of annual PSA testing for 6 years and annual DRE for 4 years; 38 340 men) and control (usual care, which sometimes included opportunistic screening; 38 345 men) arms. Screening was completed in October 2006. All incident prostate cancers and deaths from prostate cancer through 13 years of follow-up or through December 31, 2009, were ascertained. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated as the ratio of observed rates in the intervention and control arms, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution for the number of events. Poisson regression modeling was used to examine the interactions with respect to prostate cancer mortality between trial arm and age, comorbidity status, and pretrial PSA testing. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Approximately 92% of the study participants were followed to 10 years and 57% to 13 years. At 13 years, 4250 participants had been diagnosed with prostate cancer in the intervention arm compared with 3815 in the control arm. Cumulative incidence rates for prostate cancer in the intervention and control arms were 108.4 and 97.1 per 10 000 person-years, respectively, resulting in a relative increase of 12% in the intervention arm (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.17). After 13 years of follow-up, the cumulative mortality rates from prostate cancer in the intervention and control arms were 3.7 and 3.4 deaths per 10 000 person-years, respectively, resulting in a non-statistically significant difference between the two arms (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.36). No statistically significant interactions with respect to prostate cancer mortality were observed between trial arm and age (P(interaction) = .81), pretrial PSA testing (P(interaction) = .52), and comorbidity (P(interaction) = .68). CONCLUSIONS: After 13 years of follow-up, there was no evidence of a mortality benefit for organized annual screening in the PLCO trial compared with opportunistic screening, which forms part of usual care, and there was no apparent interaction with age, baseline comorbidity, or pretrial PSA testing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742
(2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40618-3 · Cited by 17,242
Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study
Schröder, F. H., Hugosson, J., Roobol, M. J., Tammela, T. L. J., Ciatto, S., Nelen, V., Kwiatkowski, M., Lujan, M., Lilja, H., Zappa, M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810084 · Cited by 4,014
Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial
Andriole, G. L., Crawford, E. D., Grubb, R. L., Buys, S. S., Chia, D., Church, T. R., Fouad, M. N., Gelmann, E. P., Kvale, P. A., Reding, D. J., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810696 · Cited by 2,906
Self-citationRadical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer
Bill-Axelson, A., Holmberg, L., Ruutu, M., Garmo, H., Stark, J. R., Busch, C., Nordling, S., Häggman, M., Andersson, S.-O., Bratell, S., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1011967 · Cited by 1,900
Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial
Hugosson, J., Carlsson, S., Aus, G., Bergdahl, S., Khatami, A., Lodding, P., Pihl, C.-G., Stranne, J., Holmberg, E., & Lilja, H. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70146-7 · Cited by 936
Draisma, G., Etzioni, R., Tsodikov, A., Mariotto, A., Wever, E., Gulati, R., Feuer, E., & de Koning, H. (2009) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djp001 · Cited by 796
All-Cause Mortality in Randomized Trials of Cancer Screening
Black, W. C. (2002) · CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment · doi:10.1093/jnci/94.3.167 · Cited by 390
Screening for prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Djulbegovic, M., Beyth, R. J., Neuberger, M. M., Stoffs, T. L., Vieweg, J., Djulbegovic, B., & Dahm, P. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c4543 · Cited by 337
Pinsky, P., Miller, A., Kramer, B., Church, T., Reding, D., Prorok, P., Gelmann, E., Schoen, R., Buys, S., Hayes, R., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwk075 · Cited by 228
Self-citation
Cited by
Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer
Wilt, T. J., Brawer, M. K., Jones, K. M., Barry, M. J., Aronson, W. J., Fox, S., Gingrich, J. R., Wei, J. T., Gilhooly, P., Grob, B. M., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1113162 · Cited by 1,770
Self-citationPadChest: A large chest x-ray image dataset with multi-label annotated reports
Bustos, A., Pertusa, A., Salinas, J.-M., & de la Iglesia-Vayá, M. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101797 · Cited by 691
Ilic, D., Djulbegovic, M., Jung, J. H., Hwang, E. C., Zhou, Q., Cleves, A., Agoritsas, T., & Dahm, P. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k3519 · Cited by 641
Fenton, J. J., Weyrich, M. S., Durbin, S., Liu, Y., Bang, H., & Melnikow, J. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.3712 · Cited by 555
Screening for Prostate Cancer With the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test: A Review of Current Evidence
Hayes, J. H., & Barry, M. J. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.2085 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Andriole, G. L., Crawford, E. D., Grubb, R. L., Buys, S. S., Chia, D., Church, T. R., Fouad, M. N., Isaacs, C., Kvale, P. A., Reding, D. J., Weissfeld, J. L., Yokochi, L. A., O'Brien, B., Ragard, L. R., Clapp, J. D., Rathmell, J. M., Riley, T. L., Hsing, A. W., Izmirlian, G., Pinsky, P. F., Kramer, B. S., Miller, A. B., Gohagan, J. K., Prorok, P. C., & for the PLCO Project Team
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-01-06
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-132
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2139566281
- Cited by
- 1,121
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 113.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prostate Cancer Screening in the Randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: Mortality Results after 13 Years of Follow-up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djr500
- The paper
- Andriole, G. L., Crawford, E. D., Grubb, R. L., Buys, S. S., Chia, D., Church, T. R., Fouad, M. N., Isaacs, C., Kvale, P. A., Reding, D. J., Weissfeld, J. L., Yokochi, L. A., O'Brien, B., Ragard, L. R., Clapp, J. D., Rathmell, J. M., Riley, T. L., Hsing, A. W., Izmirlian, G., . . . for the PLCO Project Team. (2012). Prostate Cancer Screening in the Randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: Mortality Results after 13 Years of Follow-up. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.