The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Active Smoking and Breast Cancer Risk: Original Cohort Data and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between active cigarette smoking and breast cancer risk remains controversial because of unresolved issues of confounding and dose response. METHODS: To investigate these issues further, we analyzed data from 73 388 women in the American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study II (CPS-II) Nutrition Cohort. Analyses were based on 3721 invasive breast cancer case patients identified during a median follow-up of 13.8 years. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models. P values were two-sided. We also conducted meta-analyses of our results with those published from 14 other cohort studies. RESULTS: In CPS-II, incidence was higher in current (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.42) and former smokers (HR =1.13, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.21) than in never smokers. Women who initiated smoking before menarche (HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.10 to 2.34) or after menarche but 11 or more years before first birth (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.74) had higher risk (P trend = .03). No relationships were observed with other smoking parameters. Alcohol consumption did not confound associations with smoking status, although neither current nor former smoking were associated with risk among never drinkers (P interaction = .11). In meta-analyses, current (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.16) and former smoking (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.15) were weakly associated with risk; a stronger association (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.28) was observed in women who initiated smoking before first birth. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the hypothesis that active smoking is associated with increased breast cancer risk for women who initiate smoking before first birth and suggest that smoking might play a role in breast cancer initiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37 · Cited by 26,297
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General
Office on Smoking (2004) · Cited by 2,414
(2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e601432007-001 · Cited by 1,880
A review of human carcinogens–Part E: tobacco, areca nut, alcohol, coal smoke, and salted fish
Secretan, B., Straif, K., Baan, R., Grosse, Y., El Ghissassi, F., Bouvard, V., Benbrahim-Tallaa, L., Guha, N., Freeman, C., Galichet, L., et al. (2009) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70326-2 · Cited by 1,114
Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2002) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600596 · Cited by 1,082
Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General
(2002) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200210135650 · Cited by 892
Pirie, K., Peto, R., Reeves, G. K., Green, J., & Beral, V. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61720-6 · Cited by 799
Smoking in relation to the death rates of one million men and women.
Ec, H. (1966) · PubMed · Cited by 648
Cited by
Sex and gender differences in substance use disorders
McHugh, R. K., Votaw, V. R., Sugarman, D. E., & Greenfield, S. F. (2018) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.10.012 · Cited by 1,076
Smoking and Mortality — Beyond Established Causes
Carter, B. D., Abnet, C. C., Feskanich, D., Freedman, N. D., Hartge, P., Lewis, C. E., Ockene, J. K., Prentice, R. L., Speizer, F. E., Thun, M. J., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1407211 · Cited by 809
Self-citationCigarette smoking and the oral microbiome in a large study of American adults
Wu, J., Peters, B. A., Dominianni, C., Zhang, Y., Pei, Z., Yang, L., Ma, Y., Purdue, M. P., Jacobs, E. J., Gapstur, S. M., et al. (2016) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.37 · Cited by 572
Self-citationBodai, B. I., & Tuso, P. (2015) · The Permanente Journal · doi:10.7812/tpp/14-241 · Cited by 397
Prevalence of major risk factors and use of screening tests for cancer in the United States
Fedewa, S. A., Sauer, A. G., Siegel, R. L., & Jemal, A. (2015) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0134 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaudet, M. M., Gapstur, S. M., Sun, J., Diver, W. R., Hannan, L. M., & Thun, M. J.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-02-28
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 515-525
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2125242380
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 18.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Active Smoking and Breast Cancer Risk: Original Cohort Data and Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djt023
- The paper
- Gaudet, M. M., Gapstur, S. M., Sun, J., Diver, W. R., Hannan, L. M., & Thun, M. J. (2013). Active Smoking and Breast Cancer Risk: Original Cohort Data and Meta-Analysis. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.