Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 472

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Primary Tumor Location as a Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Open access
Loupakis, Fotios, Yang, Dongyun, Yau, Linda, Feng, Shibao, Cremolini, Chiara, Zhang, Wu, Maus, Martin K. H., Antoniotti, Carlotta, Langer, Christiane, Scherer, Stefan J., Müller, Thomas, Hurwitz, Herbert I., Saltz, Leonard, Falcone, Alfredo, Lenz, Heinz-Josef·2015·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to clarify the prognostic impact of primary tumor location in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: We evaluated the association between tumor location and survival parameters in patients with previously untreated mCRC receiving first-line chemotherapy ± bevacizumab in three independent cohorts: a prospective pharmacogenetic study (PROVETTA) and two randomized phase III trials, AVF2107g and NO16966. Cancers proximal or distal of the splenic flexure were classified as right-sided or left-sided, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Data were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Among evaluable patients in the PROVETTA (n = 200), AVF2107g (n = 559), and NO16966 (n = 1268) studies, 72.0%, 63.1%, and 73.7% had left-sided tumors, respectively. In PROVETTA, patients with left-sided tumors had superior OS (left-sided vs right-sided: hazard ratio [HR] = .44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .28 to .70, P < .001) and progression-free survival (HR = .52, 95% CI = .36 to .75, P < .001) outcomes. Multivariable analyses confirmed right-sided location as a negative prognostic variable, independent of mucinous histology and BRAF mutational status. Data from the AVF2107g (HR for OS = .55, 95% CI = .43 to .70) and NO16966 trials (HR for OS = .71, 95% CI = .62 to .82 both P < .001) also showed favorable outcomes in patients with left-sided tumors. In both randomized studies, the efficacy of bevacizumab was independent of tumor location. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that primary tumor location is an important prognostic factor in previously untreated mCRC. Given the consistency across an exploratory set and two confirmatory phase III studies, side of tumor origin should be considered for stratification in randomized trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/dju427

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 472

Metadata

Authors
Loupakis, F., Yang, D., Yau, L., Feng, S., Cremolini, C., Zhang, W., Maus, M. K. H., Antoniotti, C., Langer, C., Scherer, S. J., Müller, T., Hurwitz, H. I., Saltz, L., Falcone, A., & Lenz, H.-J.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2015-02-20
Volume
107
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2152205589
Cited by
472
References
5
FWCI
20.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary Tumor Location as a Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/dju427
The paper
Loupakis, F., Yang, D., Yau, L., Feng, S., Cremolini, C., Zhang, W., Maus, M. K. H., Antoniotti, C., Langer, C., Scherer, S. J., Müller, T., Hurwitz, H. I., Saltz, L., Falcone, A., & Lenz, H.-J. (2015). Primary Tumor Location as a Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju427

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.