Imaging Aβ Plaques in Living Transgenic Mice with Multiphoton Microscopy and Methoxy-X04, a Systemically Administered Congo Red Derivative
Abstract
The identification of amyloid deposits in living Alzheimer disease (AD) patients is important for both early diagnosis and for monitoring the efficacy of newly developed anti-amyloid therapies. Methoxy-X04 is a derivative of Congo red and Chrysamine-G that contains no acid groups and is therefore smaller and much more lipophilic than Congo red or Chrysamine-G. Methoxy-X04 retains in vitro binding affinity for amyloid beta (Abeta) fibrils (Ki = 26.8 nM) very similar to that of Chrysamine-G (Ki = 25.3 nM). Methoxy-X04 is fluorescent and stains plaques, tangles, and cerebrovascular amyloid in postmortem sections of AD brain with good specificity. Using multiphoton microscopy to obtain high-resolution (1 microm) fluorescent images from the brains of living PSI/APP mice, individual plaques could be distinguished within 30 to 60 min after a single i.v. injection of 5 to 10 mg/kg methoxy-X04. A single i.p. injection of 10 mg/kg methoxy-X04 also produced high contrast images of plaques and cerebrovascular amyloid in PSI/APP mouse brain. Complementary quantitative studies using tracer doses of carbon- 11-labeled methoxy-X04 show that it enters rat brain in amounts that suggest it is a viable candidate as a positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid-imaging agent for in vivo human studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methoxy-X04 labels fibrillar amyloid beta plaques.
“Three days prior to sacrifice, APP/PS1 mice received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of methoxy-X04 (MX04) (10 mg/kg, Tocris) to label fibrillar amyloid beta plaques [37].”
From IL-1β-driven amyloid plaque clearance is associated with an expansion of transcriptionally reprogrammed microglia (2019) · cites this paper as [37]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 53 · Cited by 412
- Authors
- Klunk, W. E., Bacskai, B. J., Mathis, C. A., Kajdasz, S. T., McLellan, M. E., Frosch, M. P., Debnath, M. L., Holt, D. P., Wang, Y., & Hyman, B. T.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Klunk, William E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 797-805
- ISSN
- 0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-6578
- OpenAlex
- W274427711
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (5P01 AG15379, P01AG015379, NIH-AG01039, R01AG020226, NIH-AG08487, AG 20226)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- amyloid plaques, Alzheimer's disease, live imaging, multiphoton microscopy, cerebrovascular amyloid, PET imaging agents, carbon-11 radiotracer, amyloid imaging
- MeSH terms
- Alkenes, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Benzene, Benzene Derivatives, Binding, Competitive, Blood-Brain Barrier, Carbon Radioisotopes, Congo Red, Disease Models, Animal, Coloring Agents, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Microscopy, Peptide Fragments, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stilbenes, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Mice, Rats, Plaque, Amyloid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review