Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prognostic Value of 1p, 19q, 9p, 10q, and EGFR-FISH Analyses in Recurrent Oligodendrogliomas

Open access
Fallon, Kenneth B., Palmer, Cheryl A., Roth, Kevin A., Nabors, L. Burton, Wang, Wenquan, Carpenter, Mark, Banerjee, Ruma, Forsyth, Peter, Rich, Keith, Perry, Arie·2004·Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Although 1p/19q codeletions define "genetically favorable" oligodendrogliomas, eventual tumor progression and patient death remain constant. Genetic testing is often performed at the time of recurrence, though it is unclear whether these or other genetic alterations provide useful prognostic information. We characterized 138 of 189 (73%) available primary and recurrent oligodendroglial neoplasms from 80 patients, utilizing paired FISH probes for 1p32/1q42, 19p13/19q13, CEP7/EGFR, CEP9/p16, and PTEN/DMBT1. Patients were followed until death (49%), or a median follow-up of 8.9 years. Patients with 1p/19q codeleted tumors (71%) had an estimated overall median survival of 14.9 years with an estimated 3.9 years from first recurrence. In contrast, those lacking deletions had significantly lower estimated overall median survivals of 4.7 years and 1.0 year after first recurrence (both p < 0.001). This increased survival in patients with 1p/19q codeleted tumors remained significant when adjustments were made for age, tumor grade, type of surgical procedure, and treatment with radiation or chemotherapy. Only 1 recurrence showed focal EGFR amplification, while 5 developed 10q deletions, mostly in high-grade mixed oligoastrocytomas lacking 1p/19q deletions. In contrast, p16 (9p21) deletions were common and associated with both high grade (p < 0.001) and recurrence (p = 0.002). Our data suggest that in classic oligodendrogliomas: 1) 1p/19q tumor status is a powerful predictor of patient survival, even after recurrence; 2) p16 deletions are common progression-associated alterations; and 3) 10q deletions and EGFR amplifications are sufficiently rare to suggest the possibility of alternate diagnoses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnen/63.4.314

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Fallon, K. B., Palmer, C. A., Roth, K. A., Nabors, L. B., Wang, W., Carpenter, M., Banerjee, R., Forsyth, P., Rich, K., & Perry, A.
Venue
Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
Published
2004-04
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
314-322
ISSN
  • 0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6578
OpenAlex
W175318856
Cited by
207
References
0
FWCI
8.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Value of 1p, 19q, 9p, 10q, and EGFR-FISH Analyses in Recurrent Oligodendrogliomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnen/63.4.314
The paper
Fallon, K. B., Palmer, C. A., Roth, K. A., Nabors, L. B., Wang, W., Carpenter, M., Banerjee, R., Forsyth, P., Rich, K., & Perry, A. (2004). Prognostic Value of 1p, 19q, 9p, 10q, and EGFR-FISH Analyses in Recurrent Oligodendrogliomas. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/63.4.314

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.