The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognostic Value of 1p, 19q, 9p, 10q, and EGFR-FISH Analyses in Recurrent Oligodendrogliomas
Open accessAbstract
Although 1p/19q codeletions define "genetically favorable" oligodendrogliomas, eventual tumor progression and patient death remain constant. Genetic testing is often performed at the time of recurrence, though it is unclear whether these or other genetic alterations provide useful prognostic information. We characterized 138 of 189 (73%) available primary and recurrent oligodendroglial neoplasms from 80 patients, utilizing paired FISH probes for 1p32/1q42, 19p13/19q13, CEP7/EGFR, CEP9/p16, and PTEN/DMBT1. Patients were followed until death (49%), or a median follow-up of 8.9 years. Patients with 1p/19q codeleted tumors (71%) had an estimated overall median survival of 14.9 years with an estimated 3.9 years from first recurrence. In contrast, those lacking deletions had significantly lower estimated overall median survivals of 4.7 years and 1.0 year after first recurrence (both p < 0.001). This increased survival in patients with 1p/19q codeleted tumors remained significant when adjustments were made for age, tumor grade, type of surgical procedure, and treatment with radiation or chemotherapy. Only 1 recurrence showed focal EGFR amplification, while 5 developed 10q deletions, mostly in high-grade mixed oligoastrocytomas lacking 1p/19q deletions. In contrast, p16 (9p21) deletions were common and associated with both high grade (p < 0.001) and recurrence (p = 0.002). Our data suggest that in classic oligodendrogliomas: 1) 1p/19q tumor status is a powerful predictor of patient survival, even after recurrence; 2) p16 deletions are common progression-associated alterations; and 3) 10q deletions and EGFR amplifications are sufficiently rare to suggest the possibility of alternate diagnoses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
RAKE and LNA-ISH reveal microRNA expression and localization in archival human brain
NELSON, P. T., BALDWIN, D. A., KLOOSTERMAN, W. P., KAUPPINEN, S., PLASTERK, R. H. A., & MOURELATOS, Z. (2006) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.2258506 · Cited by 297
Metellus, P., Coulibaly, B., Colin, C., de Paula, A. M., Vasiljevic, A., Taieb, D., Barlier, A., Boisselier, B., Mokhtari, K., Wang, X. W., et al. (2010) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-010-0777-8 · Cited by 289
Clear Cell Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Distinct Histopathologic and Molecular Genetic Entity
Gobbo, S., Eble, J. N., Grignon, D. J., Martignoni, G., MacLennan, G. T., Shah, R. B., Zhang, S., Brunelli, M., & Cheng, L. (2008) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0b013e318164bcbb · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Fallon, K. B., Palmer, C. A., Roth, K. A., Nabors, L. B., Wang, W., Carpenter, M., Banerjee, R., Forsyth, P., Rich, K., & Perry, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 314-322
- ISSN
- 0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-6578
- OpenAlex
- W175318856
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Value of 1p, 19q, 9p, 10q, and EGFR-FISH Analyses in Recurrent Oligodendrogliomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnen/63.4.314
- The paper
- Fallon, K. B., Palmer, C. A., Roth, K. A., Nabors, L. B., Wang, W., Carpenter, M., Banerjee, R., Forsyth, P., Rich, K., & Perry, A. (2004). Prognostic Value of 1p, 19q, 9p, 10q, and EGFR-FISH Analyses in Recurrent Oligodendrogliomas. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/63.4.314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.