Cited by 251Fire effects on ecosystemsForest Management and PolicyRangeland and Wildlife Management

Forest Service Large Fire Area Burned and Suppression Expenditure Trends, 1970–2002

Calkin, David E., Gebert, Krista M., Jones, J. Greg, Neilson, Ronald P.·2005·Journal of Forestry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jof/103.4.179

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial attack rates appear to be relatively stable, averaging between 97 and 99 percent successful.

    “Although IA rates appear to be relatively stable (averaging between 97 and 99 percent successful, Calkin et al. 2005)”

    From Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management (2015) · cites this paper as Calkin et al. 2005

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 251

Authors
Calkin, D. E., Gebert, K. M., Jones, J. G., & Neilson, R. P.
Affiliations
US Forest Service (US)
Venue
Journal of Forestry
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
103
Issue
4
Pages
179-183
ISSN
  • 0022-1201 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3746
OpenAlex
W35975680
Cited by
251
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Forestry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
burned area, fire size, drought indices, USDA Forest Service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review