Forest Service Large Fire Area Burned and Suppression Expenditure Trends, 1970–2002
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Initial attack rates appear to be relatively stable, averaging between 97 and 99 percent successful.
“Although IA rates appear to be relatively stable (averaging between 97 and 99 percent successful, Calkin et al. 2005)”
From Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management (2015) · cites this paper as Calkin et al. 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 251
- Authors
- Calkin, D. E., Gebert, K. M., Jones, J. G., & Neilson, R. P.
- Affiliations
- US Forest Service (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Forestry
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 179-183
- ISSN
- 0022-1201 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3746
- OpenAlex
- W35975680
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Forestry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- burned area, fire size, drought indices, USDA Forest Service
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review