The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review
Open accessAbstract
Mapping vegetation through remotely sensed images involves various considerations, processes and techniques. Increasing availability of remotely sensed images due to the rapid advancement of remote sensing technology expands the horizon of our choices of imagery sources. Various sources of imagery are known for their differences in spectral, spatial, radioactive and temporal characteristics and thus are suitable for different purposes of vegetation mapping. Generally, it needs to develop a vegetation classification at first for classifying and mapping vegetation cover from remote sensed images either at a community level or species level. Then, correlations of the vegetation types (communities or species) within this classification system with discernible spectral characteristics of remote sensed imagery have to be identified. These spectral classes of the imagery are finally translated into the vegetation types in the image interpretation process, which is also called image processing. This paper presents an overview of how to use remote sensing imagery to classify and map vegetation cover. Specifically, this paper focuses on the comparisons of popular remote sensing sensors, commonly adopted image processing methods and prevailing classification accuracy assessments. The basic concepts, available imagery sources and classification techniques of remote sensing imagery related to vegetation mapping were introduced, analyzed and compared. The advantages and limitations of using remote sensing imagery for vegetation cover mapping were provided to iterate the importance of thorough understanding of the related concepts and careful design of the technical procedures, which can be utilized to study vegetation cover from remote sensed images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adam, E., Mutanga, O., & Rugege, D. (2010) · Wetlands Ecology and Management · doi:10.1007/s11273-009-9169-z · Cited by 1,018
Deilami, K., Kamruzzaman, M., & Liu, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2017.12.009 · Cited by 835
Ghosh, A., & Joshi, P. K. (2014) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.07.003 · Cited by 69
Uncertainty Assessment of Hyperspectral Image Classification: Deep Learning vs. Random Forest
Shadman Roodposhti, M., Aryal, J., Lucieer, A., & Bryan, B. A. (2019) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e21010078 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, Y., Sha, Z., & Yu, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Plant Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-23
- ISSN
- 1752-9921 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-993X
- OpenAlex
- W2005156666
- Cited by
- 1,395
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jpe/rtm005
- The paper
- Xie, Y., Sha, Z., & Yu, M. (2008). Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review. Journal of Plant Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtm005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.