Cited by 49Injury Epidemiology and PreventionSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation of Caregiver Alcohol Use to Unintentional Childhood Injury

Open access
Damashek, A., Williams, N. A., Sher, K., Peterson, L.·2009·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study used a case-crossover design to investigate the association of caregiver alcohol consumption and supervision to children's injury occurrence and severity. METHOD: A community sample of 170 mothers of toddlers was interviewed biweekly about their children's daily injuries for a period of 6 months. RESULTS: Proximal caregiver-reported alcohol use predicted higher likelihood of injury occurrence and higher injury severity, whereas caregiver-reported supervision predicted lower likelihood of injury occurrence and lower injury severity. CONCLUSION: Even at low levels, proximal caregiver alcohol use may contribute to higher risk for childhood injuries and more severe injuries. The combined effect of supervision and drinking on injury likelihood warrants further exploration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn097

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 49

Metadata

Authors
Damashek, A., Williams, N. A., Sher, K., & Peterson, L.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
2008-09-10
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
344-353
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W2140589647
Cited by
49
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K05AA017242)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01R01HD025414)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
unintentional childhood injuries, injury severity, parental supervision, toddlers, mothers, alcohol consumption, injury risk
MeSH terms
Accidents, Alcohol Drinking, Attitude, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Missouri, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Wounds and Injuries, Caregivers, Cross-Over Studies, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review