Cited by 18Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

Burnout in Nurses Working With Youth With Chronic Pain: A Pilot Intervention

Rodrigues, Nikita P, Cohen, Lindsey L, McQuarrie, Susanna Crowell, Reed-Knight, Bonney·2018·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

Objective: Nurse burnout is a significant issue, with repercussions for the nurse, patients, and health-care system. Our prior mixed-methods analyses helped inform a model of burnout in nurses working with youth with chronic pain. Our aims were to (a) detail the development of an intervention to decrease burnout; (b) evaluate the intervention's feasibility and acceptability; and (c) provide preliminary outcomes on the intervention. Method: In total, 33 nurses working on a pediatric inpatient care unit that admits patients with chronic pain conditions participated in the single-session 90-min groups (eight to nine nurses per group). The intervention consisted of four modules including (1) helping patients view pain as multifaceted and shift attention to functioning; (2) teaching problem-solving and reflective listening skills; (3) highlighting positives about patients when venting with coworkers; and (4) improving nurses own self-care practices. Measures provided assessment of feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness at baseline and 3 months postintervention in a single group, repeated measures design. Results: Data support the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Pilot outcome results demonstrated improvements in the target behaviors of education on psychosocial influences, self-care, and venting to coworkers as well as self-compassion, general health, and burnout. There were no changes in pain beliefs or the target behaviors of focus on functioning, empathizing with patient, or highlighting positives. Conclusions: Our single-session tailored group treatment was feasible and acceptable, and pilot data suggest that it is beneficial, but a more comprehensive approach is encouraged to reduce burnout that might be related to multiple individual, unit, and system factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx132

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Rodrigues, N. P., Cohen, L. L., McQuarrie, S. C., & Reed-Knight, B.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
Corresponding author
Cohen, Lindsey L
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
2017-10-24
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
382-391
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W2765918686
Cited by
18
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Resources and Services Administration (2 D40HP19643)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
nurse burnout, pediatric nurses, burnout intervention, group intervention, feasibility and acceptability, self-care, self-compassion, pain beliefs, problem-solving skills, reflective listening, pediatric inpatient care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Burnout, Professional, Child, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Pilot Projects, Psychotherapy, Group, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review