The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Dublin Regulation, Influences on Asylum Destinations and the Exception of Algerians in the UK
Open accessAbstract
Since the late 1990s factors influencing the destinations of asylum seekers have raised a growing interest in Europe. The Dublin regulation of 2003 sets out to limit asylum seekers' choice of asylum country due to the perception that this enables them to select a European country on the basis of favourable policy measures. This assumption receives very little support in the literature. Recent studies into the movement of asylum seekers suggest that family and cultural relationships and, in some cases, the role of smugglers are more significant in determining the final country of asylum. Algerians who claim asylum in Britain appear to be an exception. The experience of those interviewed indicates that these influences do not play a significant role in their decision to come to Britain. Rather, they are motivated by a range of other factors that are specific to the Franco-Algerian relationship. These factors are unrelated to European policy developments yet the Dublin regulation still aims to prevent the movement which they are alleged to cause.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, according to the 2003 Dublin II Regulation, asylum seekers must apply for protection in the first EU country of entry and remain there while their claims are assessed; if apprehended elsewhere in Europe, they may be forcibly returned to that arrival country (see Collyer 2004; Papadimitriou and Papageorgiou 2005).”
From The social aesthetics of eligibility: NGO aid and indeterminacy in the Greek asylum process (2013) · cites this paper as Collyer 2004
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The social aesthetics of eligibility: NGO aid and indeterminacy in the Greek asylum process
CABOT, H. (2013) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1111/amet.12032 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Collyer, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Collyer, M.
- ORCID
- Collyer, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Refugee Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-12-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 375-400
- ISSN
- 0951-6328 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6925
- OpenAlex
- W2163246917
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Refugee Studies (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Gender and Women's Rights
- Social Sciences › Law › European Law and Migration
- Keywords
- Dublin Regulation, asylum seekers, Algerians, French-Algerian relations, smuggling, asylum policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Dublin Regulation, Influences on Asylum Destinations and the Exception of Algerians in the UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jrs/17.4.375
- The paper
- Collyer, M. (2004). The Dublin Regulation, Influences on Asylum Destinations and the Exception of Algerians in the UK. Journal of Refugee Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/17.4.375