Cited by 4Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesCultural History and Identity FormationFashion and Cultural Textiles

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Soft Rejuvenation: Cosmetics, Idealized White Femininity, and Young Women’s Bodies, 1880–1930

Smith, Michelle J, Nicholas, Jane·2020·Journal of Social History

Abstract

In this article we draw together the histories of rejuvenation and cosmetic use in order to examine discourses of “soft rejuvenation” in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. While rejuvenation has typically been considered in relation to transnational medicalized attempts to restore youthful vitality and virility, we suggest that the logic of rejuvenation was feminized through the promotion of cosmetic and daily self-care regimens in this period. Drawing on material from British, American, and Canadian contexts relating to beauty and hygiene, we suggest that daily practices of caring for and disciplining the white female body, especially through cosmetic use, were legitimated, in part, using the rhetoric of rejuvenation. The article considers how the transnational, the modern, and the propagation of whiteness in the early twentieth century were mobilized in these ideas of how daily bodily work could preserve the (white) youthful face and body, which was understood to embody health and vigor. This discourse was significant for young women, who were subject to male control over their bodies as they began to be employed in nontraditional workplaces; however, we also argue that these cosmetic practices can be understood as a component of girls’ and women’s own self-fashioning of modern identities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jsh/shz036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 4

Metadata

Authors
Smith, M. J., & Nicholas, J.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Literary Studies (HU)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Nicholas, Jane
Venue
Journal of Social History
Published
2020
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
906-921
ISSN
  • 0022-4529 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1897
OpenAlex
W3032909133
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Social History (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Cultural History and Identity Formation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Fashion and Cultural Textiles
Keywords
cosmetics, white femininity, self-care, whiteness, modernity, women's employment, late nineteenth and early twentieth century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soft Rejuvenation: Cosmetics, Idealized White Femininity, and Young Women’s Bodies, 1880–1930. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jsh/shz036
The paper
Smith, M. J., & Nicholas, J. (2020). Soft Rejuvenation: Cosmetics, Idealized White Femininity, and Young Women’s Bodies, 1880–1930. Journal of Social History. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shz036