The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Soft Rejuvenation: Cosmetics, Idealized White Femininity, and Young Women’s Bodies, 1880–1930
Abstract
In this article we draw together the histories of rejuvenation and cosmetic use in order to examine discourses of “soft rejuvenation” in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. While rejuvenation has typically been considered in relation to transnational medicalized attempts to restore youthful vitality and virility, we suggest that the logic of rejuvenation was feminized through the promotion of cosmetic and daily self-care regimens in this period. Drawing on material from British, American, and Canadian contexts relating to beauty and hygiene, we suggest that daily practices of caring for and disciplining the white female body, especially through cosmetic use, were legitimated, in part, using the rhetoric of rejuvenation. The article considers how the transnational, the modern, and the propagation of whiteness in the early twentieth century were mobilized in these ideas of how daily bodily work could preserve the (white) youthful face and body, which was understood to embody health and vigor. This discourse was significant for young women, who were subject to male control over their bodies as they began to be employed in nontraditional workplaces; however, we also argue that these cosmetic practices can be understood as a component of girls’ and women’s own self-fashioning of modern identities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to some studies, products like SPF-containing cosmetics or tinted moisturizers shield the skin from damaging UV rays, serving the dual purposes of preserving health and enhancing appearance [5].”
From AN OVERVIEW OF NEW TRENDS IN THE COSMETICS INDUSTRY (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“When taken as a whole, these instances show how the cosmetics sector is changing to promote holistic well-being by fusing visual appeal with real health advantages.”
From AN OVERVIEW OF NEW TRENDS IN THE COSMETICS INDUSTRY (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, M. J., & Nicholas, J.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Literary Studies (HU)
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Nicholas, Jane
- Venue
- Journal of Social History
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 906-921
- ISSN
- 0022-4529 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1897
- OpenAlex
- W3032909133
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Journal of Social History (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Cultural History and Identity Formation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Fashion and Cultural Textiles
- Keywords
- cosmetics, white femininity, self-care, whiteness, modernity, women's employment, late nineteenth and early twentieth century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Soft Rejuvenation: Cosmetics, Idealized White Femininity, and Young Women’s Bodies, 1880–1930. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jsh/shz036
- The paper
- Smith, M. J., & Nicholas, J. (2020). Soft Rejuvenation: Cosmetics, Idealized White Femininity, and Young Women’s Bodies, 1880–1930. Journal of Social History. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shz036