The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE ORIGINS OF THE MANDAEANS AND THEIR SCRIPT
Abstract
Journal Article THE ORIGINS OF THE MANDAEANS AND THEIR SCRIPT Get access R. MACUCH R. MACUCH Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Semitic Studies, Volume XVI, Issue 2, AUTUMN 1971, Pages 174–192, https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/XVI.2.174 Published: 01 October 1971
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mandaeism is not a Christian phenomenon, and its Gnostic aspects, though eclectic, basically belong outside Christian influences (cf. Macuch 1971, pp. 174-92; Buckley 2010, pp. 14-15).”
From Probing the Relationships Between Mandaeans (the Followers of John the Baptist), Early Christians, and Manichaeans (2024) · cites this paper as Macuch 1971, pp. 174-92
Citations
Metadata
- Authors
- MACUCH, R.
- Corresponding author
- MACUCH, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Semitic Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1971
- Volume
- XVI
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 174-192
- ISSN
- 0022-4480 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-8556
- OpenAlex
- W2056012134
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Semitic Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Keywords
- Mandaeans, Mandaic script, Mandaic language, ancient scripts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
