The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE FALL OF SATAN AND ADAM'S PENANCE: THREE NOTES ON THE BOOKS OF ADAM AND EVE
Abstract
MICHAEL E. STONE; THE FALL OF SATAN AND ADAM'S PENANCE: THREE NOTES ON THE BOOKS OF ADAM AND EVE, The Journal of Theological Studies, Volume 44, Issue 1, 1 Apri
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
2 Enoch 30:12 describes Adam as the king of the earth.
“2 Enoch 30:12 describes Adam as the king of the earth.22”
From ON THE POLEMICAL NATURE OF 2 (SLAVONIC) ENOCH: A REPLY TO C. BÖTTRICH (2003) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ON THE POLEMICAL NATURE OF 2 (SLAVONIC) ENOCH: A REPLY TO C. BÖTTRICH
Orlov, A. (2003) · Journal for the Study of Judaism · doi:10.1163/15700630360702802 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- STONE, M. E.
- Corresponding author
- STONE, MICHAEL E.
- ORCID
- STONE, MICHAEL E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Theological Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 143-156
- ISSN
- 0022-5185 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4607
- OpenAlex
- W2080408993
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2019: 13 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Theological Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Keywords
- fall of Satan, biblical exegesis, Adam and Eve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
