The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
RUFINUS AND THE TURA PAPYRUS OF ORIGEN‘S COMMENTARY OF ROMANS
Abstract
H. CHADWICK; RUFINUS AND THE TURA PAPYRUS OF ORIGEN‘S COMMENTARY OF ROMANS, The Journal of Theological Studies, Volume X, Issue 1, 1 April 1959, Pages 10–42, ht
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- CHADWICK, H.
- Corresponding author
- CHADWICK, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Theological Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1959
- Volume
- X
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-42
- ISSN
- 0022-5185 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4607
- OpenAlex
- W2044743268
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Theological Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Augustinian Studies and Theology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
- Keywords
- Rufinus, Origen, Commentary on Romans, patristic exegesis, textual transmission, Greek papyri
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RUFINUS AND THE TURA PAPYRUS OF ORIGEN‘S COMMENTARY OF ROMANS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jts/x.1.10
- The paper
- CHADWICK, H. (1959). RUFINUS AND THE TURA PAPYRUS OF ORIGEN‘S COMMENTARY OF ROMANS. The Journal of Theological Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/x.1.10
