Cited by 13Plant tissue culture and regenerationPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFlowering Plant Growth and Cultivation

In vitro Growth of Vegetative Tomato Shoot Apices

HUSSEY, G.·1971·Journal of Experimental Botany

Abstract

Explants from the shoot apex of the tomato, comprising the apical dome and youngest primordium together with small amounts of sub-apical tissue were cultured for periods of 1 to 4 plastochrons. By the use of a simple parameter, the axillary distance, the growth-rate could be accurately monitored throughout each plastochron. Gibberellic acid, coconut milk, and kinetin, in addition to sucrose and inorganic salts, all promoted growth of the apex; a combination of gibberellic acid and coconut milk gave the fastest growth. Temperature had a large effect on the growth-rate with an in vitro Q10 of 2.1 contrasted with an in vivo Q10 of 1.2 over the range of 15 to 25 °C. On gibberellic acid and coconut milk at 15 °C two-thirds of the in vivo growth--rate was sustained in culture for two plastochrons after which the growth-rate gradually declined; at 20 and 25 °C growth-rates slightly higher than in vivo rates were sustained for 1 plastochron before a more rapid decline. The anatomy of these in vitro apices was normal for 1½ plastochrons after which there were small increases in cell volume in the developing primordium. Reducing the amount of sub-apical tissue drastically reduced the growth rate but had little effect on the responses to gibberellic acid and coconut milk. Explants are considered to be useful material for studying the changes that take place in the apex during the course of 1 or 2 plastochrons, but inadequate on the media tested for experiments involving longer periods o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jxb/22.3.688

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In tomato, the number of cell divisions is reduced in the boundary region between the apical meristem and developing leaf primordia.

    “In tomato, the number of cell divisions is reduced in the boundary region between the apical meristem and developing leaf primordia (Hussey, 1971; Fig. 1c).”
  • Boundaries are generally characterized by a low number of cell divisions and specific patterns of gene expression.

    “In general, boundaries are characterized by a low number of cell divisions (Hussey, 1971;Reddy et al., 2004) and specific patterns of gene expression (Souer et al., 1996;Aida et al., 1997;Takada et al., 2001;Vroemen et al., 2003;Weir et al., 2004;Berger et al., 2009).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HUSSEY, G.
Affiliations
John Innes Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
HUSSEY, G.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
1971
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
688-701
ISSN
  • 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2431
OpenAlex
W2121972687
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Botany (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
Keywords
tomato, shoot apical meristem, in vitro culture, plastochron, gibberellic acid, coconut milk, kinetin, temperature effects on growth, growth rate, apical dome, explant culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review