Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,031

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biochemical Limitations to Carbon Assimilation in C3Plants—A Retrospective Analysis of the A/CiCurves from 109 Species

WULLSCHLEGER, STAN D.·1993·Journal of Experimental Botany

Abstract

Species-specific differences in the assimilation of atmospheric CO2 depends upon differences in the capacities for the biochemical reactions that regulate the gas-exchange process. Quantifying these differences for more than a few species, however, has proven difficult. Therefore, to understand better how species differ in their capacity for CO2 assimilation, a widely used model, capable of partitioning limitations to the activity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase, to the rate of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate regeneration via electron transport, and to the rate of triose phosphate utilization was used to analyse 164 previously published A/Ci, curves for 109 C3 plant species. Based on this analysis, the maximum rate of carboxylation, Vcmax, ranged from 6μmol m−2 s−1 for the coniferous species Picea abies to 194μmol m−2 s−1 for the agricultural species Beta vulgaris, and averaged 64μmol m−2 s−1 across all species. The maximum rate of electron transport, Jmax, ranged from 17μmol m−2 s−1 again for Picea abies to 372μmol m−2 s−1 for the desert annual Malvastrum rotundifolium, and averaged 134μmol m−2 s−1 across all species. A strong positive correlation between Vcmax and Jmax indicated that the assimilation of CO2 was regulated in a co-ordinated manner by these two component processes. Of the A/Ci curves analysed, 23 showed either an insensitivity or reversed-sensitivity to increasing CO2 concentration, indicating that CO2 assimilation was limited by the utilization of triose phosphates. The rate of triose phosphate utilization ranged from 4·9 μmol m−2 s−1 for the tropical perennial Tabebuia rosea to 20·1 μmol m−2 s−1 for the weedy annual Xanthium strumarium, and averaged 10·1 μmol m−2 s−1 across all species. Despite what at first glance would appear to be a wide range of estimates for the biochemical capacities that regulate CO2 assimilation, separating these species-specific results into those of broad plant categories revealed that Vcmax and Jmax were in general higher for herbaceous annuals than they were for woody perennials. For annuals, Vcmax and Jmax averaged 75 and 154 μmol m−2 s−1, while for perennials these same two parameters averaged only 44 and 97 μmol m−2 s−1, respectively. Although these differences between groups may be coincidental, such an observation points to differences between annuals and perennials in either the availability or allocation of resources to the gas-exchange process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jxb/44.5.907

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
WULLSCHLEGER, S. D.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
1993
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
907-920
ISSN
  • 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2431
OpenAlex
W2096466966
Cited by
1,031
References
1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biochemical Limitations to Carbon Assimilation in C3Plants—A Retrospective Analysis of the A/CiCurves from 109 Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/44.5.907
The paper
WULLSCHLEGER, S. D. (1993). Biochemical Limitations to Carbon Assimilation in C3Plants—A Retrospective Analysis of the A/CiCurves from 109 Species. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/44.5.907

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.