The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Partitioning of shoot and root dry matter and carbohydrates in bean plants suffering from phosphorus, potassium and magnesium deficiency
Abstract
The influence of varied supply of phosphorus (10 and 250 mmol P m−3) potassium (50 and 2010 mmol K m−3) and magnesium (20 and 1000 mmol Mg m−3) on the partitioning of dry matter and carbohydrates (reducing sugars, sucrose and starch) between shoots and roots was studied in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants grown in nutrient solution over a 12 d period. Shoot and root growth were quite differently affected by low supply of P, K, and Mg. The shoot/root dry weight ratios were 4.9 in the control (sufficient plants), 1.8 in P-deficient, 6.9 in K-deficient and 10.2 in Mg-deficient plants. In primary (source) leaves, but not in trifoliate leaves, concentrations of reducing sugars, sucrose and starch were also differently affected by low nutrient supply. In primary leaves under K deficiency and, particularly Mg deficiency, the concentrations of sucrose and reducing sugars were much higher than in control and P-deficient plants. Magnesium deficiency also distinctly increased the starch concentration in the primary leaves. In contrast, in roots, the lowest concenfrations of sucrose, reducing sugars and starch were found in Mg-deficient plants, whereas the concentrations of sucrose and starch were particularly high in P-deficient plants. There was a close relationship between shoot/root dry weight ratios and relative distribution of total carbohydrates (sugars and starch) in shoot and roots. Of the total amounts of carbohyd rates per plant, the following proportions were parti tioned to the roots: 22.7% in P-deficient, 15.7% in control, 3.4% in K-deficient and 0.8% in Mg-deficient plants. The results indicate a distinct role of Mg and K in the export of photosynthates from leaves to roots and suggest that alteration in photosynthate partitioning plays a major role in the differences in dry matter distribution between shoots and roots of plants suffering from mineral nutrient deficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants
Cakmak, I. (2005) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.200420485 · Cited by 1,300
Self-citationHow do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation?
Hermans, C., Hammond, J. P., White, P. J., & Verbruggen, N. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.10.007 · Cited by 1,238
Carvalhais, L. C., Dennis, P. G., Fedoseyenko, D., Hajirezaei, M., Borriss, R., & von Wirén, N. (2011) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.201000085 · Cited by 601
Gransee, A., & Führs, H. (2013) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1567-y · Cited by 554
Sucrose transport in the phloem: integrating root responses to phosphorus starvation
Hammond, J. P., & White, P. J. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erm221 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Cakmak, I., Hengeler, C., & Marschner, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1245-1250
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2112657359
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partitioning of shoot and root dry matter and carbohydrates in bean plants suffering from phosphorus, potassium and magnesium deficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/45.9.1245
- The paper
- Cakmak, I., Hengeler, C., & Marschner, H. (1994). Partitioning of shoot and root dry matter and carbohydrates in bean plants suffering from phosphorus, potassium and magnesium deficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/45.9.1245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.