The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Changes in plant response to NaCl during development of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties differing in salinity resistance
Abstract
The effects of NaCl stress on growth and development of rice {Oryza sativa L.) were studied and compared in varieties of various origins. During the vegetative stage, tall indica landraces (Nona Bokra, Buhra Rata, Panwell, and Pokkali) appeared to be resistant throughout while in japonica varieties (I Kong Pao (IKP) and Tainung 67) and elite breeding lines (IR 4630, IR 2153 and IR 31785), resistance fluctuated. Panwell, which was the only indica variety evaluated during the reproductive stage, also expressed salt resistance during booting, heading and grain maturation while varieties with the greatest variability in salt stress response during the vegetative phase (IR 4630, IR 31785 and IKP) also showed the greatest variability during reproductive development. Thus, varietal levels of resistance to salinity at different growth stages are not necessarily interdependent characteristics. Variability in salt resistance of different genotypes during the vegetative and reproductive phases of development was not correlated to their mean level of relative resistance. There was an ontogenic evolution of salt resistance and the young seedling stage appeared to be the most sensitive to NaCI during vegetative growth. Nevertheless, short- and middle term effects of stress have to be distinguished for each genotype since some varieties showed better growth during the second week of stress than during the first, whilst others showed an opposite trend. Moreover, even at specific stages of development, plant responses to NaCI were quite variable according to the criterion used to quantify salinity resistance. The identification of genotypes resistant to NaCI at specific developmental stages is essential to improve the understanding of the effects of salt stress upon phenology and to elaborate further breeding programmes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
LUTTS, S. (1996) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.1996.0134 · Cited by 1,617
Self-citationWalia, H., Wilson, C., Condamine, P., Liu, X., Ismail, A. M., Zeng, L., Wanamaker, S. I., Mandal, J., Xu, J., Cui, X., et al. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.065961 · Cited by 474
Sarker, U., & Oba, S. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34944-0 · Cited by 409
Plant Growth And Development Under Salinity Stress
Läuchli, A., & Grattan, S. R. (2007) · Advances in Molecular Breeding Toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5578-2_1 · Cited by 401
Sarker, U., & Oba, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.559876 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Lutts, S., Kinet, J. M., & Bouharmont, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1843-1852
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W1988143469
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in plant response to NaCl during development of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties differing in salinity resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/46.12.1843
- The paper
- Lutts, S., Kinet, J. M., & Bouharmont, J. (1995). Changes in plant response to NaCl during development of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties differing in salinity resistance. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/46.12.1843
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.