The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cuticular water permeability and its physiological significance
Abstract
Cuticles act as solution-diffusion membranes for water transport. Diffusion in pores does not contribute to cuticular transpiration. An extensive literature survey of cuticular permeances (P) and minimum leaf conductances (g(min)) to water is presented. The two variables cannot be distinguished with most experimental techniques. Results from different experiments are in good agreement with each other for some species, for example, Fagus sylvatica L., but not for others, such as Picea abies (L.) Karst. In a data set of 313 values of P or g(min) from 200 species, distributions of results obtained with different techniques were found to differ significantly. Likely reasons include water loss from incompletely closed or incompletely sealed stomata, and the dependence of P on moisture content of the cuticle and on storage time of isolated cuticles. Contrasting evidence for an interaction between cuticular transpiration and stomatal sensitivity to air humidity is presented. The occurrence of unusually high g(min) in trees growing at the alpine treeline and its physiological significance are discussed. It is shown that g(min) is of little value as a predictor for drought resistance of crops, with the possible exception of Sorghum bicolor L. Moench. Possible water uptake from fog or dew across cuticles is considered briefly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A first assessment of the impact of the extreme 2018 summer drought on Central European forests
Schuldt, B., Buras, A., Arend, M., Vitasse, Y., Beierkuhnlein, C., Damm, A., Gharun, M., Grams, T. E. E., Hauck, M., Hajek, P., et al. (2020) · Basic and Applied Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2020.04.003 · Cited by 1,021
Bourdenx, B., Bernard, A., Domergue, F., Pascal, S., Léger, A., Roby, D., Pervent, M., Vile, D., Haslam, R. P., Napier, J. A., et al. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.172320 · Cited by 522
Vogg, G., Fischer, S., Leide, J., Emmanuel, E., Jetter, R., Levy, A. A., & Riederer, M. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erh149 · Cited by 348
Jetter, R., & Riederer, M. (2016) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.15.01699 · Cited by 206
(2009) · International Agrophysics · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Kerstiens, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1813-1832
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2119133572
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cuticular water permeability and its physiological significance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/47.12.1813
- The paper
- Kerstiens, G. (1996). Cuticular water permeability and its physiological significance. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.12.1813
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.