The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The duration and rate of grain growth, and harvest index, of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in response to temperature and CO2
Abstract
Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Hereward) was grown in the field inside polyethylene-covered tunnels at a range of temperatures at either 380 or 684 μmol mol−1 CO2. Serial harvests were taken from anthesis until harvest maturity. Grain yield was reduced by warmer temperatures, but increased by CO2 enrichment at all temperatures. During grain-filling, individual grain dry weight was a linear function of time from anthesis until mass maturity (attainment of maximum grain dry weight) within each plot. The rate of progress to mass maturity (the reciprocal of time to mass maturity) was a positive linear function of mean temperature, but was not affected by CO2 concentration. The rate of increase in grain dry weight per ear was 2.0 mg d−1 greater per 1 °C rise, and was 8.0 mg d−1 greater at 684 compared with 380 μmol mol−1 CO2 at a given temperature. The rate of increase in harvest index was 1.0% d−1 in most plots at 380 μmol mol−1 CO2 and in open field plots, compared with 1.18% d−1 in all plots at 684 μmol mol−1 CO2. Thus, the increased rate of grain growth observed at an elevated CO2 concentration could be attributed partly to a change in the partitioning of assimilates to the grain. In contrast, the primary effect of warmer temperatures was to shorten the duration of grain-filling. The rate of grain growth at a given temperature and the rate of increase in harvest index were only independent of the number of grains per ear above a critical grain number of 23–24 grains per ear (˜20 000 grains m−2).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
Monteith, J. L. (1977) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 · Cited by 3,484
Cited by
Interactions between increasing CO2 concentration and temperature on plant growth
MORISON, J. I. L., & LAWLOR, D. W. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00443.x · Cited by 509
Self-citationAmthor, J. S. (2001) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/s0378-4290(01)00179-4 · Cited by 417
Heat stress in cereals: Mechanisms and modelling
Eyshi Rezaei, E., Webber, H., Gaiser, T., Naab, J., & Ewert, F. (2015) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2014.10.003 · Cited by 313
Can elevated CO2 combined with high temperature ameliorate the effect of terminal drought in wheat?
Dias de Oliveira, E., Bramley, H., Siddique, K. H. M., Henty, S., Berger, J., & Palta, J. A. (2013) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp12206 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheeler, T. R., Hong, T. D., Ellis, R. H., Batts, G. R., Morison, J. I. L., & Hadley, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 623-630
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2153798303
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The duration and rate of grain growth, and harvest index, of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in response to temperature and CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/47.5.623
- The paper
- Wheeler, T. R., Hong, T. D., Ellis, R. H., Batts, G. R., Morison, J. I. L., & Hadley, P. (1996). The duration and rate of grain growth, and harvest index, of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in response to temperature and CO2. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.5.623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.