Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Locating QTL for osmotic adjustment and dehydration tolerance in rice

Lilley, J.M., Ludlow, M. M., McCouch, S.R., O'Toole, J.C.·1996·Journal of Experimental Botany

Abstract

Research was conducted to identify and map quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with dehydration tolerance and osmotic adjustment of rice. Osmotic adjustment capacity and lethal osmotic potential were determined for 52 recombinant inbred lines grown in a controlled environment under conditions of a slowly developed stress. The lines were from a cross between an Indica cultivar, Co39, of lowland adaptation and a Japonica cultivar, Moroberekan, a traditional upland cultivar. The QTL analysis was conducted using single marker analysis (ANOVA) and interval analysis (Mapmaker/QTL). The measurements obtained and the QTL identified were compared to root traits and leaf rolling scores measured on the same lines. One major locus was associated with osmotic adjustment. The putative locus for osmotic adjustment may be homoeologous with a single recessive gene previously identified for the same trait in wheat. The putative osmotic adjustment locus and two of the five QTL associated with dehydration tolerance were close to chromosomal regions associated with root morphology. In this population, osmotic adjustment and dehydration tolerance were negatively associated with root morphological characters associated with drought avoidance. High osmotic adjustment and dehydration tolerance were associated with Co39 alleles and extensive root systems were associated with Moroberekan alleles. To combine high osmotic adjustment with extensive root systems, the linkage between these traits will need to be broken. Alternatively, if the target environment is a lowland environment with only brief water deficit periods, selection for drought tolerance characteristics without consideration of the root system may be most appropriate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jxb/47.9.1427

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Plant Breeding for Stress Environments

    Blum, A. (2018) · doi:10.1201/9781351075718 · Cited by 1,309 · cited 4×

    “Consequently, it has been suggested that improvements in yield could be achieved more efficiently by identifying characteristics that allow a plant to escape, avoid or tolerate water stress, and selecting for those traits in a breeding programme (O'Toole and Chang, 1979; O'Toole, 1982; Morgan, 1984; Hanson et al., 198…”
    BackgroundInfluential

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Lilley, J. M., Ludlow, M. M., McCouch, S. R., & O'Toole, J. C.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
1996
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
1427-1436
ISSN
  • 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2431
OpenAlex
W2066543286
Cited by
260
References
1
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Locating QTL for osmotic adjustment and dehydration tolerance in rice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/47.9.1427
The paper
Lilley, J. M., Ludlow, M. M., McCouch, S. R., & O'Toole, J. C. (1996). Locating QTL for osmotic adjustment and dehydration tolerance in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.9.1427

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.