Cited by 8Antimicrobial Peptides and ActivitiesFungal Plant Pathogen ControlPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modes of action and bio-fungicide potential of peptides derived from the Medicago truncatula bi-domain defensin MtDef5

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The Medicago truncatula bi-domain defensin MtDef5 exhibits activity against some fungal pathogens at sub-micromolar concentrations. It is comprised of two single-domain defensins, MtDef5A and MtDef5B, connected with the linker peptide APKKVEP. MtDef5B exhibits greater anti-fungal potency compared with MtDef5A. Here, we identified amino acid residues important for anti-fungal activity of MtDef5B, and determined its modes of action. MtDef5B inhibited spore germination of Botrytis cinerea (Bc) at low micromolar concentrations, but not that of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Cg). MtDef5B permeabilized the plasma membrane, induced the production of reactive oxygen species, and localized to the nucleoli in Bc germlings. We selected the carboxy-terminal MtDef5A-derived GMA5AC peptide for mutagenesis because of its lower cationic charge than the corresponding MtDef5B-derived peptide, and found that it inhibited spore germination of Bc, but not of Cg. However, a variant, GMA5AC_V2, did inhibit spore germination of Cg and exhibited a multi-faceted mode of action. Spraying GMA5AC_V2 on the leaves of pepper plants resulted in pre- and post-inoculation control of the gray mold disease caused by Bc. Furthermore, when applied on tomato fruits pre-inoculated with Cg, this peptide reduced the anthracnose disease symptoms. These results highlight the potential of short-chain defensin-derived peptides for management of fungal diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jxb/eraf166

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Camacho, 2009, BLAST+: architecture and applications, BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 421, 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cools, 2017, Antifungal plant defensins: increased insight in their mode of action as a basis for their use to combat fungal infections, Future Microbiology, 12, 441, 10.2217/fmb-2016-0181 · DOI
  3. Djami-Tchatchou, 2023, Small cationic cysteine-rich defensin-derived antifungal peptide controls white mold in soybean, Journal of Fungi, 9, 873, 10.3390/jof9090873 · DOI
  4. Farkas, 2014, Medicago truncatula symbiotic peptide NCR247 contributes to bacteroid differentiation through multiple mechanisms, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111, 5183, 10.1073/pnas.1404169111 · DOI
  5. Hawkins, 2023, Contrasting levels of genetic predictability in the evolution of resistance to major classes of fungicides, Molecular Ecology, 30, 5318, 10.1111/mec.15877 · DOI
  6. Islam, 2017, A novel bi-domain plant defensin MtDef5 with potent broad-spectrum antifungal activity binds to multiple phospholipids and forms oligomers, Scientific Reports, 7, 16157, 10.1038/s41598-017-16508-w · DOI
  7. Kovaleva, 2020, Plant defensins from a structural perspective, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, 5307, 10.3390/ijms21155307 · DOI
  8. Li, 2024, Modes of action and potential as a peptide-based biofungicide of a plant defensin MtDef4, Molecular Plant Pathology, 25, e134538, 10.1111/mpp.13458 · DOI
  9. Li, 2019, Antifungal potency and modes of action of a novel olive tree defensin against closely related ascomycete fungal pathogens, Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 32, 1649, 10.1094/MPMI-08-19-0224-R · DOI
  10. Liang, 2001, Antifungal polypeptide from alfalfa and methods for controlling plant pathogenic fungi
  11. Lobo, 2022, Host-defense peptides as new generation phytosanitaries: low toxicity and low induction of antimicrobial resistance, Agronomy, 12, 1614, 10.3390/agronomy12071614 · DOI
  12. Ma, 2023, Evolution of antimicrobial cysteine-rich peptides in plants, Plant Cell Reports, 42, 1517, 10.1007/s00299-023-03044-3 · DOI
  13. Mansfeld, 2020, Developmentally regulated activation of defense allows for rapid inhibition of infection in age-related resistance to Phytophthora capsici in cucumber fruit, BMC Genomics, 21, 628, 10.1186/s12864-020-07040-9 · DOI
  14. Parisi, 2019, The evolution, function and mechanisms of action for plant defensins, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, 88, 107, 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.02.004 · DOI
  15. Pettersen, 2021, UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers, Protein Science, 30, 70, 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
  16. Rosa, 2022, Game-changing alternatives to conventional fungicides: small RNAs and short peptides, Trends in Biotechnology, 40, 320, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.07.003 · DOI
  17. Sagaram, 2013, Structural and functional studies of a phosphatidic-acid binding antifungal plant defensin MtDef4: identification of an RGFRRR motif governing fungal cell entry, PLoS ONE, 8, e82485, 10.1371/journal.pone.0082485 · DOI
  18. Sievers, 2018, Clustal Omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences, Protein Science, 27, 135, 10.1002/pro.3290 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Slezina, 2022, The g-core motif peptides of plant AMPs as novel antimicrobials for medicine and agriculture, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24, 483, 10.3390/ijms24010483 · DOI
  20. Slezina, 2021, Synthetic oligopeptides mimicking g-core regions of cysteine-rich peptides of Solanum lycopersicum possess antimicrobial activity against human and plant pathogens, Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 43, 1226, 10.3390/cimb43030087 · DOI
  21. Steinberg, 2020, Fungi, fungicide discovery and global food security, Fungal Genetics and Biology, 144, 103476, 10.1016/j.fgb.2020.103476 · DOI
  22. Tang, 2023, Application of antimicrobial peptides in plant protection: making use of the overlooed merits, Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1139539, 10.3389/fpls.2023.1139539 · DOI
  23. Tetorya, 2023, Plant defensin MtDef4-derived antifungal peptide with multiple modes of action and potential as a bioinspired fungicide, Molecular Plant Pathology, 24, 896, 10.1111/mpp.13336 · DOI
  24. van der Weerden, 2013, Properties and mechanisms of action of naturally occurring antifungal peptides, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 70, 3545, 10.1007/s00018-013-1260-1 · DOI
  25. Velivelli, 2020, Antifungal symbiotic peptide NCR044 exhibits unique structure and multifaceted mechanisms of action that confer plant protection, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 117, 16043, 10.1073/pnas.2003526117 · DOI
  26. Velivelli, 2018, Modes of action of a bi-domain plant defensin MtDef5 against a bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas campestris, Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 934, 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00934 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Kalunke, R. M., Pokhrel, A., Tetorya, M., Godwin, J., Nath, V. S., Czymmek, K. J., & Shah, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Donald Danforth Plant Science Center (US)
  • United Arab Emirates University (AE)
Corresponding author
Shah, Dilip M
Venue
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
2025-04-22
Volume
76
Issue
19
Pages
5755-5769
ISSN
  • 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2431
OpenAlex
W4409690176
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Botany (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (IOS:1955461)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Keywords
antifungal activity, Botrytis cinerea, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, spore germination inhibition, plasma membrane permeabilization, reactive oxygen species, nucleolar localization, gray mold, anthracnose, Medicago truncatula, biofungicides, plant disease control
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Fungicides, Industrial, Peptides, Plant Diseases, Plant Proteins, Spores, Fungal, Botrytis, Colletotrichum, Defensins, Medicago truncatula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review