The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Irradiance and phenotype: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion
Open accessAbstract
The subject of this paper, sun leaves are thicker and show higher photosynthetic rates than the shade leaves, is approached in two ways. The first seeks to answer the question: why are sun leaves thicker than shade leaves? To do this, CO2 diffusion within a leaf is examined first. Because affinity of Rubisco for CO2 is low, the carboxylation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate is competitively inhibited by O2, and the oxygenation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate leads to energy-consuming photorespiration, it is essential for C3 plants to maintain the CO2 concentration in the chloroplast as high as possible. Since the internal conductance for CO2 diffusion from the intercellular space to the chloroplast stroma is finite and relatively small, C3 leaves should have sufficient mesophyll surfaces occupied by chloroplasts to secure the area for CO2 dissolution and transport. This explains why sun leaves are thicker. The second approach is mechanistic or 'how-oriented'. Mechanisms are discussed as to how sun leaves become thicker than shade leaves, in particular, the long-distance signal transduction from mature leaves to leaf primordia inducing the periclinal division of the palisade tissue cells. To increase the mesophyll surface area, the leaf can either be thicker or have smaller cells. Issues of cell size are discussed to understand plasticity in leaf thickness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Escalona, J. M., Sampol, B., & Medrano, H. (2002) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp01119 · Cited by 701
Cited by
Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield.
Zhu, X.-G., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206 · Cited by 1,902
The temperature response of C 3 and C 4 photosynthesis
SAGE, R. F., & KUBIEN, D. S. (2007) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01682.x · Cited by 1,127
Physiological and structural tradeoffs underlying the leaf economics spectrum
Onoda, Y., Wright, I. J., Evans, J. R., Hikosaka, K., Kitajima, K., Niinemets, Ü., Poorter, H., Tosens, T., & Westoby, M. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14496 · Cited by 722
Niinemets, Ü. (2010) · Ecological Research · doi:10.1007/s11284-010-0712-4 · Cited by 676
Paradiso, R., & Proietti, S. (2022) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-021-10337-y · Cited by 601
Metadata
- Authors
- Terashima, I., Hanba, Y. T., Tazoe, Y., Vyas, P., & Yano, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-12-15
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 343-354
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2116110382
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Irradiance and phenotype: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erj014
- The paper
- Terashima, I., Hanba, Y. T., Tazoe, Y., Vyas, P., & Yano, S. (2006). Irradiance and phenotype: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.