The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phloem-sap feeding by animals: problems and solutions
Open accessAbstract
The incidence of phloem sap feeding by animals appears paradoxical. Although phloem sap is nutrient-rich compared with many other plant products and generally lacking in toxins and feeding deterrents, it is consumed as the dominant or sole diet by a very restricted range of animals, exclusively insects of the order Hemiptera. These insects display two sets of adaptations. First, linked to the high ratio of non-essential:essential amino acids in phloem sap, these insects contain symbiotic micro-organisms which provide them with essential amino acids. For example, bacteria of the genus Buchnera contribute up to 90% of the essential amino acids required by the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum feeding on Vicia faba. Second, the insect tolerance of the very high sugar content and osmotic pressure of phloem sap is promoted by their possession in the gut of sucrase-transglucosidase activity, which transforms excess ingested sugar into long-chain oligosaccharides voided via honeydew. Various other animals consume phloem sap by proxy, through feeding on the honeydew of phloem-feeding hemipterans. Honeydew is physiologically less extreme than phloem sap, with a higher essential:non-essential amino acid ratio and lower osmotic pressure. Even so, ant species strongly dependent on honeydew as food may benefit from nutrients derived from their symbiotic bacteria Blochmannia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology
(1985) · Journal of Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/0022-1910(85)90117-9 · Cited by 4,810
Biochemistry & molecular biology of plants
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-3895 · Cited by 2,977
Encyclopedia of plant physiology, New series
Harborne, J. B. (1978) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(00)94191-8 · Cited by 2,034
Nutritional Interactions in Insect-Microbial Symbioses: Aphids and Their Symbiotic Bacteria Buchnera
Douglas, A. E. (1998) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.17 · Cited by 1,386
Self-citationGenome sequence of the endocellular bacterial symbiont of aphids Buchnera sp. APS
Shigenobu, S., Watanabe, H., Hattori, M., Sakaki, Y., & Ishikawa, H. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35024074 · Cited by 1,309
Endosymbiosis of Animals with Plant Microorganisms
Batra, L. R., & Buchner, P. (1968) · Mycologia · doi:10.2307/3757184 · Cited by 1,245
Protective Ant-Plant Interactions as Model Systems in Ecological and Evolutionary Research
Heil, M., & McKey, D. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132410 · Cited by 718
Explaining the Abundance of Ants in Lowland Tropical Rainforest Canopies
Davidson, D. W., Cook, S. C., Snelling, R. R., & Chua, T. H. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1082074 · Cited by 685
50 Million Years of Genomic Stasis in Endosymbiotic Bacteria
Tamas, I., Klasson, L., Canbäck, B., Näslund, A. K., Eriksson, A.-S., Wernegreen, J. J., Sandström, J. P., Moran, N. A., & Andersson, S. G. E. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1071278 · Cited by 642
MYCETOCYTE SYMBIOSIS IN INSECTS
DOUGLAS, A. E. (1989) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1989.tb00682.x · Cited by 524
Self-citation
Cited by
Multiorganismal Insects: Diversity and Function of Resident Microorganisms
Douglas, A. E. (2015) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020822 · Cited by 1,315
Self-citationScaleNet: a literature-based model of scale insect biology and systematics
(2016) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/bav118 · Cited by 685
Plant–aphid interactions: molecular and ecological perspectives
Goggin, F. L. (2007) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2007.06.004 · Cited by 400
Mutti, N. S., Louis, J., Pappan, L. K., Pappan, K., Begum, K., Chen, M.-S., Park, Y., Dittmer, N., Marshall, J., Reese, J. C., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0708958105 · Cited by 393
Kant, M. R., Jonckheere, W., Knegt, B., Lemos, F., Liu, J., Schimmel, B. C. J., Villarroel, C. A., Ataide, L. M. S., Dermauw, W., Glas, J. J., et al. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcv054 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Douglas, A. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01-31
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 747-754
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2155550675
- Cited by
- 648
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 21.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phloem-sap feeding by animals: problems and solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erj067
- The paper
- Douglas, A. E. (2006). Phloem-sap feeding by animals: problems and solutions. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
