The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Barley transcript profiles under dehydration shock and drought stress treatments: a comparative analysis
Open accessAbstract
A microarray including 1654 cDNAs, mainly derived from dehydration-shocked barley leaf tissues, was utilized to monitor expression changes in leaves of barley plants subjected to slow drying conditions (7 d and 11 d: 7d-WS and 11d-WS) in soil and after rehydration. The results were compared with those obtained under shock-like conditions imposed with a 6 h dehydration treatment. A total number of 173 transcripts (approximately 10% of all transcripts profiled) were declared up- or down-regulated in at least one of the conditions tested. The majority of the transcripts were regulated by only one of the drought treatments, with 57% of the differentially expressed transcripts exclusively affected in the dehydration shock treatment, 6% at 7d-WS, 14% at 11d-WS, and 6% after rehydration. Irrespective of the low percentage of transcripts (10%) with similar expression changes between shock and slow stress treatments, a sizeable portion of these transcripts shared a common expression trend under the different drought treatment conditions, as evidenced by low but significant correlations between the fast occurring and the 7d-WS and 11d-WS treatments (r=0.32 and 0.41, P=0.001, respectively). These results are discussed with respect to the merit of different dehydration treatments in the investigation of the changes in transcript profiling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era
Tuberosa, R. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00347 · Cited by 558
Self-citationBowne, J. B., Erwin, T. A., Juttner, J., Schnurbusch, T., Langridge, P., Bacic, A., & Roessner, U. (2012) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1093/mp/ssr114 · Cited by 489
Integrated genomics, physiology and breeding approaches for improving drought tolerance in crops
Mir, R. R., Zaman-Allah, M., Sreenivasulu, N., Trethowan, R., & Varshney, R. K. (2012) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-012-1904-9 · Cited by 477
Guo, P., Baum, M., Grando, S., Ceccarelli, S., Bai, G., Li, R., von Korff, M., Varshney, R. K., Graner, A., & Valkoun, J. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp194 · Cited by 403
Xue, G.-P., McIntyre, C. L., Glassop, D., & Shorter, R. (2008) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-008-9311-y · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Talame, V., Ozturk, N. Z., Bohnert, H. J., & Tuberosa, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-11-06
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-240
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2125176583
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barley transcript profiles under dehydration shock and drought stress treatments: a comparative analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erl163
- The paper
- Talame, V., Ozturk, N. Z., Bohnert, H. J., & Tuberosa, R. (2006). Barley transcript profiles under dehydration shock and drought stress treatments: a comparative analysis. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.