The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative proteomic analysis of NaCl stress-responsive proteins in Arabidopsis roots
Open accessAbstract
NaCl stress is a major abiotic stress limiting the productivity and the geographical distribution of many plant species. Roots are the primary site of salinity perception. To understand better NaCl stress responses in Arabidopsis roots, a comparative proteomic analysis of roots that had been exposed to 150 mM NaCl for either 6 h or 48 h was conducted. Changes in the abundance of protein species within roots were examined using two-dimensional electrophoresis. Among the >1000 protein spots reproducibly detected on each gel, the abundance of 112 protein spots decreased and 103 increased, at one or both time points, in response to NaCl treatment. Through liquid-chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, identity was assigned to 86 of the differentially abundant spots. The proteins identified included many previously characterized stress-responsive proteins and others related to processes including scavenging for reactive oxygen species; signal transduction; translation, cell wall biosynthesis, protein translation, processing and degradation; and metabolism of energy, amino acids, and hormones. At the resolution of individual genes and proteins, poor statistical correlation (6 h, r= -0.13; 48 h, r=0.11) of these protein expression data with previous microarray results was detected, supporting the concept that post-transcriptional regulation plays an important role in stress-responsive gene expression, and highlighting the need for combined transcriptomic and proteomic analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction
Apel, K., & Hirt, H. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701 · Cited by 11,723
Cited by
Hu, Y., Jiang, L., Wang, F., & Yu, D. (2013) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.113.112631 · Cited by 830
Saibo, N. J. M., Lourenço, T., & Oliveira, M. M. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn227 · Cited by 483
Widodo, Patterson, J. H., Newbigin, E., Tester, M., Bacic, A., & Roessner, U. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp243 · Cited by 462
Mechanisms of Plant Salt Response: Insights from Proteomics
Zhang, H., Han, B., Wang, T., Chen, S., Li, H., Zhang, Y., & Dai, S. (2012) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr200861w · Cited by 377
Abiotic stress responses in plant roots: a proteomics perspective
Ghosh, D., & Xu, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00006 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, Y., Yang, B., Harris, N. S., & Deyholos, M. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3591-3607
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2132966812
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative proteomic analysis of NaCl stress-responsive proteins in Arabidopsis roots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erm207
- The paper
- Jiang, Y., Yang, B., Harris, N. S., & Deyholos, M. K. (2007). Comparative proteomic analysis of NaCl stress-responsive proteins in Arabidopsis roots. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.