The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rubiscolytics: fate of Rubisco after its enzymatic function in a cell is terminated
Open accessAbstract
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) is the predominant protein in photosynthesizing plant parts and the most abundant protein on earth. Amino acids deriving from its net degradation during senescence are transported to sinks (e.g. developing leaves, fruits). Rubisco catabolism is not controlled only by the overall sink demand. An accumulation of carbohydrates may also accelerate senescence and Rubisco degradation under certain conditions. Amino acids produced by proteolysis are rapidly redistributed in plants with proper source-sink relationships. In leaves of wheat plants with reduced sink capacity (e.g. sink removal, phloem interruption by steam girdling at the leaf base), Rubisco is degraded and free amino acids accumulate. They may be washed out in the rain during late senescence. In leaves of depodded soybeans, Rubisco is degraded and amino acids can be reutilized in these leaves for the synthesis of special vacuolar proteins in the paraveinal mesophyll (vegetative storage proteins). Nitrogen deriving from Rubisco degradation in older (senescing) leaves of annual crops is integrated to some extent again in newly synthesized Rubisco in younger leaves or photosynthesizing tissues of fruits. Finally, a high percentage of this nitrogen is accumulated in protein bodies (storage proteins). At the subcellular level, Rubisco can be degraded in intact chloroplasts. Reactive oxygen species may directly cleave the large subunit or modify it to become more susceptible to proteolysis. A metalloendopeptidase may play an important role in Rubisco degradation within intact chloroplasts. Additionally, the involvement of vacuolar endopeptidase(s) in Rubisco catabolism (at least under certain conditions) was postulated by various laboratories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Autophagy, plant senescence, and nutrient recycling
Avila-Ospina, L., Moison, M., Yoshimoto, K., & Masclaux-Daubresse, C. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eru039 · Cited by 369
Nitrogen and water resources commonly limit crop yield increases, not necessarily plant genetics
Sinclair, T. R., & Rufty, T. W. (2012) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2012.07.001 · Cited by 344
Rubisco regulation: a role for inhibitors
Parry, M. A. J., Keys, A. J., Madgwick, P. J., Carmo-Silva, A. E., & Andralojc, P. J. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ern084 · Cited by 299
Genetic engineering of microalgae for enhanced biorefinery capabilities
Fayyaz, M., Chew, K. W., Show, P. L., Ling, T. C., Ng, I.-S., & Chang, J.-S. (2020) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107554 · Cited by 225
Enhancing C3 photosynthesis: an outlook on feasible interventions for crop improvement.
Singh, J., Pandey, P., James, D., Chandrasekhar, K., Achary, V. M. M., Kaul, T., Tripathy, B. C., & Reddy, M. K. (2014) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12246 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Feller, U., Anders, I., & Mae, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-06-19
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1615-1624
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2100874251
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rubiscolytics: fate of Rubisco after its enzymatic function in a cell is terminated. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erm242
- The paper
- Feller, U., Anders, I., & Mae, T. (2007). Rubiscolytics: fate of Rubisco after its enzymatic function in a cell is terminated. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.