The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High concentrations of Na+ and Cl– ions in soil solution have simultaneous detrimental effects on growth of faba bean under salinity stress
Open accessAbstract
Despite the fact that most plants accumulate both sodium (Na(+)) and chloride (Cl(-)) ions to high concentration in their shoot tissues when grown in saline soils, most research on salt tolerance in annual plants has focused on the toxic effects of Na(+) accumulation. There have also been some recent concerns about the ability of hydroponic systems to predict the responses of plants to salinity in soil. To address these two issues, an experiment was conducted to compare the responses to Na(+) and to Cl(-) separately in comparison with the response to NaCl in a soil-based system using two varieties of faba bean (Vicia faba), that differed in salinity tolerance. The variety Nura is a salt-sensitive variety that accumulates Na(+) and Cl(-) to high concentrations while the line 1487/7 is salt tolerant which accumulates lower concentrations of Na(+) and Cl(-). Soils were prepared which were treated with Na(+) or Cl(-) by using a combination of different Na(+) salts and Cl(-) salts, respectively, or with NaCl. While this method produced Na(+)-dominant and Cl(-)-dominant soils, it unavoidably led to changes in the availability of other anions and cations, but tissue analysis of the plants did not indicate any nutritional deficiencies or toxicities other than those targeted by the salt treatments. The growth, water use, ionic composition, photosynthesis, and chlorophyll fluorescence were measured. Both high Na(+) and high Cl(-) reduced growth of faba bean but plants were more sensitive to Cl(-) than to Na(+). The reductions in growth and photosynthesis were greater under NaCl stress and the effect was mainly additive. An important difference to previous hydroponic studies was that increasing the concentrations of NaCl in the soil increased the concentration of Cl(-) more than the concentration of Na(+). The data showed that salinity caused by high concentrations of NaCl can reduce growth by the accumulation of high concentrations of both Na(+) and Cl(-) simultaneously, but the effects of the two ions may differ. High Cl(-) concentration reduces the photosynthetic capacity and quantum yield due to chlorophyll degradation which may result from a structural impact of high Cl(-) concentration on PSII. High Na(+) interferes with K(+) and Ca(2+) nutrition and disturbs efficient stomatal regulation which results in a depression of photosynthesis and growth. These results suggest that the importance of Cl(-) toxicity as a cause of reductions in growth and yield under salinity stress may have been underestimated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants
(1995) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-473542-2.x5000-7 · Cited by 19,181
Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 · Cited by 13,792
Genty, B., Briantais, J.-M., & Baker, N. R. (1989) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/s0304-4165(89)80016-9 · Cited by 8,644
Mechanisms of Salt Tolerance in Nonhalophytes
Greenway, H., & Munns, R. (1980) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.001053 · Cited by 4,003
Na+ Tolerance and Na+ Transport in Higher Plants
TESTER, M. (2003) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcg058 · Cited by 3,250
The Australian Soil Classification
National Committee on Soil and Terrain, & Isbell, R. (2016) · CSIRO Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1071/9781486304646 · Cited by 2,537
Water Retention: Laboratory Methods
Klute, A. (1986) · SSSA Book Series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c26 · Cited by 2,275
Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives
Epstein, E. Z. (1973) · Cited by 2,206
Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives
Ingestad, T. (1973) · Forest Science · doi:10.1093/forestscience/19.2.156 · Cited by 1,538
Plant Analysis: An Interpretation Manual
(1997) · CSIRO Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1071/9780643101265 · Cited by 1,341
Cited by
Mechanisms of plant response to salt and drought stress and their alteration by rhizobacteria
Forni, C., Duca, D., & Glick, B. R. (2017) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-016-3007-x · Cited by 447
Oustriere, N., Marchand, L., Galland, W., Gabbon, L., Lottier, N., Motelica, M., & Mench, M. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.091 · Cited by 72
Chennakesavulu, K., Singh, H., Trivedi, P. K., Jain, M., & Yadav, S. R. (2022) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-021-02681-w · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Tavakkoli, E., Rengasamy, P., & McDonald, G. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-08-16
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 4449-4459
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2096543639
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High concentrations of Na+ and Cl– ions in soil solution have simultaneous detrimental effects on growth of faba bean under salinity stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erq251
- The paper
- Tavakkoli, E., Rengasamy, P., & McDonald, G. K. (2010). High concentrations of Na+ and Cl– ions in soil solution have simultaneous detrimental effects on growth of faba bean under salinity stress. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.