The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sugars, signalling, and plant development
Open accessAbstract
Like all organisms, plants require energy for growth. They achieve this by absorbing light and fixing it into a usable, chemical form via photosynthesis. The resulting carbohydrate (sugar) energy is then utilized as substrates for growth, or stored as reserves. It is therefore not surprising that modulation of carbohydrate metabolism can have profound effects on plant growth, particularly cell division and expansion. However, recent studies on mutants such as stimpy or ramosa3 have also suggested that sugars can act as signalling molecules that control distinct aspects of plant development. This review will focus on these more specific roles of sugars in development, and will concentrate on two major areas: (i) cross-talk between sugar and hormonal signalling; and (ii) potential direct developmental effects of sugars. In the latter, developmental mutant phenotypes that are modulated by sugars as well as a putative role for trehalose-6-phosphate in inflorescence development are discussed. Because plant growth and development are plastic, and are greatly affected by environmental and nutritional conditions, the distinction between purely metabolic and specific developmental effects is somewhat blurred, but the focus will be on clear examples where sugar-related processes or molecules have been linked to known developmental mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SUGAR SENSING AND SIGNALING IN PLANTS: Conserved and Novel Mechanisms
Rolland, F., Baena-Gonzalez, E., & Sheen, J. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105441 · Cited by 2,328
Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses
Garg, A. K., Kim, J.-K., Owens, T. G., Ranwala, A. P., Choi, Y. D., Kochian, L. V., & Wu, R. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252637799 · Cited by 1,346
Sugar signals and molecular networks controlling plant growth
Smeekens, S., Ma, J., Hanson, J., & Rolland, F. (2010) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.002 · Cited by 655
Cited by
An Overview of Sucrose Synthases in Plants
Stein, O., & Granot, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00095 · Cited by 717
Sugar demand, not auxin, is the initial regulator of apical dominance
Mason, M. G., Ross, J. J., Babst, B. A., Wienclaw, B. N., & Beveridge, C. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1322045111 · Cited by 565
Abiotic Stress - Plant Responses and Applications in Agriculture
(2013) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/45842 · Cited by 381
Is metabolic rate a universal ‘pacemaker’ for biological processes?
Glazier, D. S. (2015) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12115 · Cited by 335
Sucrose signaling in higher plants
Yoon, J., Cho, L.-H., Tun, W., Jeon, J.-S., & An, G. (2021) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110703 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Eveland, A. L., & Jackson, D. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-12-03
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3367-3377
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2170908567
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sugars, signalling, and plant development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/err379
- The paper
- Eveland, A. L., & Jackson, D. P. (2012). Sugars, signalling, and plant development. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.