The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stay-green in spring wheat can be determined by spectral reflectance measurements (normalized difference vegetation index) independently from phenology
Open accessAbstract
The green area displayed by a crop is a good indicator of its photosynthetic capacity, while chlorophyll retention or 'stay-green' is regarded as a key indicator of stress adaptation. Remote-sensing methods were tested to estimate these parameters in diverse wheat genotypes under different growing conditions. Two wheat populations (a diverse set of 294 advanced lines and a recombinant inbred line population of 169 sister lines derived from the cross between Seri and Babax) were grown in Mexico under three environments: drought, heat, and heat combined with drought. In the two populations studied here, a moderate heritable expression of stay-green was found-when the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at physiological maturity was estimated using the regression of NDVI over time from the mid-stages of grain-filling to physiological maturity-and for the rate of senescence during the same period. Under heat and heat combined with drought environments, stay-green calculated as NDVI at physiological maturity and the rate of senescence, showed positive and negative correlations with yield, respectively. Moreover, stay-green calculated as an estimation of NDVI at physiological maturity and the rate of senescence regressed on degree days give an independent measurement of stay-green without the confounding effect of phenology. On average, in both populations under heat and heat combined with drought environments CTgf and stay-green variables accounted for around 30% of yield variability in multiple regression analysis. It is concluded that stay-green traits may provide cumulative effects, together with other traits, to improve adaptation under stress further.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physiological Traits for Improving Heat Tolerance in Wheat
Cossani, C. M., & Reynolds, M. P. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.207753 · Cited by 344
Self-citationPhenotyping for drought tolerance in grain crops: when is it useful to breeders?
Passioura, J. B. (2012) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp12079 · Cited by 306
Dynamic monitoring of NDVI in wheat agronomy and breeding trials using an unmanned aerial vehicle
Duan, T., Chapman, S. C., Guo, Y., & Zheng, B. (2017) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.025 · Cited by 282
Kyratzis, A. C., Skarlatos, D. P., Menexes, G. C., Vamvakousis, V. F., & Katsiotis, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01114 · Cited by 134
Redefining agricultural residues as bioenergy feedstocks
Caicedo, M., Barros, J., & Ordás, B. (2016) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma9080635 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopes, M. S., & Reynolds, M. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-03-12
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3789-3798
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2165670902
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stay-green in spring wheat can be determined by spectral reflectance measurements (normalized difference vegetation index) independently from phenology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/ers071
- The paper
- Lopes, M. S., & Reynolds, M. P. (2012). Stay-green in spring wheat can be determined by spectral reflectance measurements (normalized difference vegetation index) independently from phenology. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.