The DOI matches its Crossref record; 237 of the 237 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field
Abstract
Plant responses to different stresses are highly complex and involve changes at the transcriptome, cellular, and physiological levels. Recent evidence shows that plants respond to multiple stresses differently from how they do to individual stresses, activating a specific programme of gene expression relating to the exact environmental conditions encountered. Rather than being additive, the presence of an abiotic stress can have the effect of reducing or enhancing susceptibility to a biotic pest or pathogen, and vice versa. This interaction between biotic and abiotic stresses is orchestrated by hormone signalling pathways that may induce or antagonize one another, in particular that of abscisic acid. Specificity in multiple stress responses is further controlled by a range of molecular mechanisms that act together in a complex regulatory network. Transcription factors, kinase cascades, and reactive oxygen species are key components of this cross-talk, as are heat shock factors and small RNAs. This review aims to characterize the interaction between biotic and abiotic stress responses at a molecular level, focusing on regulatory mechanisms important to both pathways. Identifying master regulators that connect both biotic and abiotic stress response pathways is fundamental in providing opportunities for developing broad-spectrum stress-tolerant crop plants.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Significant differences that are observed for short durations under controlled laboratory or glasshouse conditions may yield only minor or negligible improvement once in the field (Hirayama and Shinozaki, 2010;Atkinson and Urwin, 2012).”
From Genetic resources and precise gene editing for targeted improvement of barley abiotic stress tolerance (2023) · cites this paper as Atkinson and Urwin, 2012
In the citing paper
“Plant stress response is interactive and non-additive, with some genes acting synergistically and others antagonistically.”
From Genetic resources and precise gene editing for targeted improvement of barley abiotic stress tolerance (2023) · cites this paper as Atkinson and Urwin, 2012
In the citing paper
“Once an initial abiotic stress response is activated, plants may alter how they respond to secondary stress, resulting in a phenotype that is unexpected from observing a single stress in isolation (Mittler, 2006;Atkinson and Urwin, 2012).”
From Genetic resources and precise gene editing for targeted improvement of barley abiotic stress tolerance (2023) · cites this paper as Atkinson and Urwin, 2012
Citations
Cites
Items 201–237 of 237
Evaluation of transgenic tomato plants ectopically expressing the rice Osmyb4 gene
Vannini, C., Campa, M., Iriti, M., et al. (2007) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.05.007 · Cited by 103
Luo, M., Liang, X., Dang, P. M., et al. (2005) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.05.020 · Cited by 101
Mehrotra, M., Singh, A. K., Sanyal, I., Altosaar, I., & Amla, D. V. (2011) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-011-0501-3 · Cited by 99
Henfling, J. W. D. M. (1980) · Phytopathology · doi:10.1094/phyto-70-1074 · Cited by 92
Yan, Y., Zhang, Y., YANG, K. Y., et al. (2010) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04467.x · Cited by 91
Biotic and abiotic causes of yield failure in tropical aerobic rice
Kreye, C., Bouman, B. A. M., Réversat, G., et al. (2009) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.02.005 · Cited by 90
Priyanka, B., Kambakam, S., Reddy, V. D., et al. (2009) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00467.x · Cited by 90
Plant Drought Stress and Outbreaks of Spider Mites: A Field Test
English‐Loeb, G. M. (1990) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938277 · Cited by 88
Diourté, M., Starr, J. L., Jeger, M. J., et al. (1995) · Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.1995.tb02729.x · Cited by 84
Audenaert, K. (2002) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.128.2.491 · Cited by 73
Post‐translational protein modification as a tool for transcription reprogramming
Spoel, S. H., Tada, Y., & Loake, G. J. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03125.x · Cited by 72
Bechtold, U., Lawson, T., Mejía-Carranza, J., Meyer, R. C., Brown, I. R., Altmann, T., Ton, J., & Mullineaux, P. M. (2010) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02198.x · Cited by 70
Evidence of unique and shared responses to major biotic and abiotic stresses in chickpea
Mantri, N. L., Ford, R., Coram, T. E., & Pang, E. (2010) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.05.003 · Cited by 69
The pyramid of transgenes TsVP and BetA effectively enhances the drought tolerance of maize plants
Wei, A., He, C., Li, B., et al. (2010) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00548.x · Cited by 64
Urwin, P. E., Green, J., & Atkinson, H. J. (2003) · Molecular Breeding · doi:10.1023/a:1026352620308 · Cited by 63
Self-citationMore than the Sum of Its Parts
Konforti, B. B. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.01.002 · Cited by 61
Hong, J. K., Choi, H. W., Hwang, I. S., et al. (2006) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-006-9110-2 · Cited by 59
Suleman, P., Al-Musallam, A. A., & Menezes, C. A. (2001) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pdis.2001.85.1.80 · Cited by 55
Hewezi, T., Léger, M., & Gentzbittel, L. (2008) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn071 · Cited by 53
Suppressive effect of abscisic acid on systemic acquired resistance in tobacco plants
Kusajima, M., Yasuda, M., Kawashima, A., et al. (2010) · Journal of General Plant Pathology · doi:10.1007/s10327-010-0218-5 · Cited by 52
Vaahtera, L., & Brosché, M. (2010) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.11.009 · Cited by 50
Audebert, A., Coyne, D., Dingkuhn, M., et al. (2000) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004734415254 · Cited by 48
Haverkort, A. J., Fasan, T., & van de Waart, M. (1991) · European Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1007/bf01995965 · Cited by 45
Cockfield, S. D., & Potter, D. (1986) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00377318 · Cited by 43
Mauch‐Mani, B., & Flors, V. (2009) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2009.135 · Cited by 42
Yalamanchili, R., & Stratmann, J. W. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m203844200 · Cited by 41
Capitão, C., Paiva, J. A. P., dos Santos, D. M. M. F., & Fevereiro, P. S. (2011) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-11-79 · Cited by 41
Duan, X., Song, Y., Yang, A., et al. (2008) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01194.x · Cited by 38
Badu‐Apraku, B., & Yallou, C. G. (2009) · Journal of Plant Registrations · doi:10.3198/jpr2008.06.0356crg · Cited by 34
The influence of cyst nematodes and drought on potato growth
Haverkort, A. J., Groenwold, J., & van de Waart, M. (1994) · European Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1007/bf01874806 · Cited by 28
Otim, M. H., Legg, J. P., Kyamanywa, S., et al. (2005) · Biocontrol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/09583150500335558 · Cited by 26
Peng, X., Tang, X., Zhou, P., et al. (2011) · Agricultural Sciences in China · doi:10.1016/s1671-2927(11)60074-6 · Cited by 25
Mohamed, R., Meilan, R., Ostry, M. E., et al. (2001) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/cjfr-31-2-268 · Cited by 23
Smit, A. L., & Vamerali, T. (1998) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(98)00033-1 · Cited by 22
Coyne, D., Smith, M. C. M., & Plowright, R. A. (2001) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(00)00193-6 · Cited by 17
......................................................, P., Xi-xu, Tang, et al. (2011) · Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni · Cited by 11
Interaction of Meloidogyne incognita and Coal-Smoke Pollutants on Tomato
Khan, M. R., & Khan, M. W. (1996) · Nematropica · Cited by 10
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 2008, 69, 2149
- 1969, Phytopathology, 59, 1632
- 1996, NEMATROPICA, 26, 47
- 2001, Canadian Journal of Forest Research (Print), 31, 268
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abiotic and biotic stress combinations
Suzuki, N., Rivero, R. M., Shulaev, V., Blumwald, E., & Mittler, R. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12797 · Cited by 2,153
Nejat, N., & Mantri, N. (2017) · Current Issues in Molecular Biology · doi:10.21775/cimb.023.001 · Cited by 287
The effects of climate change associated abiotic stresses on maize phytochemical defenses
Vaughan, M. M., Block, A., Christensen, S. A., Allen, L. H., & Schmelz, E. A. (2018) · Phytochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11101-017-9508-2 · Cited by 179
Barley Genes as Tools to Confer Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops
Gürel, F., Öztürk, Z. N., Uçarlı, C., & Rosellini, D. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01137 · Cited by 130
Chopra, R., Burow, G., Burke, J. J., Gladman, N., & Xin, Z. (2017) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-016-0966-2 · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Atkinson, N. J., & Urwin, P. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-03-30
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3523-3543
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2116808860
- Cited by
- 1,880
- References
- 237
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 140 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 179 · 2021: 169 · 2020: 163 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 154 · 2016: 160 · 2015: 107 · 2014: 92 · 2013: 88 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Botany (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Keywords
- biotic stress, abiotic stress, stressor interactions, plant stress response, abscisic acid signaling, hormone crosstalk, transcription factors, kinase cascade, reactive oxygen species, heat shock transcription factor, small RNA, stress tolerance, cultivated plants, gene expression regulation
- MeSH terms
- Plant Proteins, Plants, Stress, Physiological, Signal Transduction, Ecosystem, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Plant Physiological Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
