The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smaller, faster stomata: scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance
Open accessAbstract
Maximum and minimum stomatal conductance, as well as stomatal size and rate of response, are known to vary widely across plant species, but the functional relationship between these static and dynamic stomatal properties is unknown. The objective of this study was to test three hypotheses: (i) operating stomatal conductance under standard conditions (g (op)) correlates with minimum stomatal conductance prior to morning light [g (min(dawn))]; (ii) stomatal size (S) is negatively correlated with g (op) and the maximum rate of stomatal opening in response to light, (dg/dt)(max); and (iii) g (op) correlates negatively with instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUE) despite positive correlations with maximum rate of carboxylation (Vc (max)) and light-saturated rate of electron transport (J (max)). Using five closely related species of the genus Banksia, the above variables were measured, and it was found that all three hypotheses were supported by the results. Overall, this indicates that leaves built for higher rates of gas exchange have smaller stomata and faster dynamic characteristics. With the aid of a stomatal control model, it is demonstrated that higher g (op) can potentially expose plants to larger tissue water potential gradients, and that faster stomatal response times can help offset this risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Cited by
Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world
Bertolino, L. T., Caine, R. S., & Gray, J. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00225 · Cited by 706
Leakey, A. D. B., Ferguson, J. N., Pignon, C. P., Wu, A., Jin, Z., Hammer, G. L., & Lobell, D. B. (2019) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040305 · Cited by 372
Marchin, R. M., Backes, D., Ossola, A., Leishman, M. R., Tjoelker, M. G., & Ellsworth, D. S. (2022) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15976 · Cited by 384
The influence of stomatal morphology and distribution on photosynthetic gas exchange
Harrison, E. L., Arce Cubas, L., Gray, J. E., & Hepworth, C. (2020) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.14560 · Cited by 292
Perspectives on improving photosynthesis to increase crop yield
Croce, R., Carmo-Silva, E., Cho, Y. B., Ermakova, M., Harbinson, J., Lawson, T., McCormick, A. J., Niyogi, K. K., Ort, D. R., Patel-Tupper, D., et al. (2024) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1093/plcell/koae132 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Drake, P. L., Froend, R. H., & Franks, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 495-505
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2166521630
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smaller, faster stomata: scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/ers347
- The paper
- Drake, P. L., Froend, R. H., & Franks, P. J. (2013). Smaller, faster stomata: scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.