The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NEITHER CUSTOMARY NOR LEGAL: AFRICAN CUSTOMARY LAW IN AN ERA OF FAMILY LAW REFORM
Abstract
Family law in Africa appears to involve a clash between the customary law and the modernizing ambitions of post-colonial states. An adequate conceptualizing of the customary law is, therefore, a necessary part of the comprehension of the politics of family law reform in modern Africa. The relatively recent overthrow of the colonial states has made it an important part of the symbolical politics of modern Africa to reassert African values and institutions. Because of the difficulties of utilizing the customary in other realms of law, family law has borne the burden of an invocation of custom which has served to obscure the realities of gender and generational conflict in modern Africa. The African family laws which were established during the colonial situation were, however, the product of the colonial state and of far-reaching economic changes. Processes of state sponsored legalization, and the disruption of family formation and workings by the money economy and labour migration, led to the dominance of a new version of customary law which suited the white administrators and African male elders who ruled colonial society. This version of the customary law is not the only one derivable from the ways in which people lived their lives in which alternative values were demonstrated. By re-integrating the history of African family law with that of other parts of the world we can escape the false dichotomies which have dominated discussions of the subject and free ourselves of the…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“extended into ever increasingly wider spheres of authority than was previously envisaged in traditional authority, such as in marriage, divorce, property inheritance, and custody of children”
From The Coloniality and Evolution of African Customary Law (2025) · cites this paper as Chanock 1989
In the citing paper
“These were all governed in native courts from the perspective of colonial officials (such as a common law lens that was based on British morality and norms of justice through the (in)famous repugnancy clauses ) (Chanock 1989, Owino 2016) and that preserved African traditional elders' male interests (Parpart 1988).”
From The Coloniality and Evolution of African Customary Law (2025) · cites this paper as Chanock 1989
In the citing paper
“Settler colonialism was characterised by different models of governance to manage vast colony countries, chief among them indirect rule through chieftaincy (Chanock 1989).”
From The Coloniality and Evolution of African Customary Law (2025) · cites this paper as Chanock 1989
In the citing paper
“Chieftaincies involved a 'patriarchal coalition' between traditional male elders (chiefs) who ruled in collaboration with colonial authorities (who”
From The Coloniality and Evolution of African Customary Law (2025) · cites this paper as Chanock 1989
Citations
Cited by
How to combine tradition and modernity? Regulating customary land management in Ghana
Ubink, J. M., & Quan, J. F. (2008) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.06.002 · Cited by 208
The concept of living customary law: a critique
Diala, A. C. (2017) · The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law · doi:10.1080/07329113.2017.1331301 · Cited by 73
The Coloniality and Evolution of African Customary Law
Gayoye, M. (2025) · Oñati Socio-Legal Series · doi:10.35295/osls.iisl.1976 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- CHANOCK, M.
- Affiliations
- Ford Foundation (US)
- Corresponding author
- CHANOCK, MARTIN
- Venue
- "International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family"
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-88
- ISSN
- 0950-4109 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-9939
- 1464-3707
- OpenAlex
- W1986167183
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Law Policy and the Family (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Family and Matrimonial Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Studies and Ethnography
- Keywords
- African customary law, family law reform, colonialism, postcolonial state, gender conflict, intergenerational conflict, monetary economy, labor migration, traditionalism, African cultural identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.