The Secret Life of Pronouns. What Our Words Say About Us
Abstract
This is a great book that aims to popularize the study of how function words such as pronouns, but also articles, prepositions, and auxiliary verbs, reveal personality traits and roles within relationships. James Pennebaker is a social psychologist who has made major contributions in understanding how people who have gone through traumatic experiences may be helped by writing about them. He has also invested a good deal of time in developing techniques for counting function words and interpreting differences in their distributions. And while Pennebaker focuses on interpreting differences in distributions as reflections of different personality types or different roles in relations, he is interested in a wide range of other topics in which the interpretation of the word frequencies might play a role, including psychological health, emotions, honesty vs. deception, corporate and regional identity, literature, authorship attribution, authority in relationships, and political appeal. The book deserves a review in LLC because it pays attention to linguistic and literary interests, and especially because it adds an interpretive dimension to stylometry (the study of style using exact techniques), which has been underdeveloped to-date (but see, too, Noecker et al., 2013). As readers of this journal know, stylometry has come to focus increasingly on authorship attribution as an objective validation of its work, and has come to accept—with some demurring voices (Burrows, 2007)—that function word distributions are the most interesting indicators of authorship. I will criticize Pennebaker a bit later in the text for largely ignoring the stylometric literature, but I will focus on what he does contribute, and that is a great deal. The focused contribution Pennebaker is making concerns the interpretation of stylometric results—e.g. what does it mean if we find that an author uses an unusual number of first person singular pronouns (I-words)? His results are often surprising.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psycholinguistics provides insight into how the brain processes function words and grammatical markers distinctively from lexical content words, revealing correlations with socio-cultural categories such as gender, age, and native language.
“Psychology, particularly psycholinguistics, provides insight into how the brain processes function words and grammatical markers distinctively from lexical content words, revealing correlations with socio-cultural categories such as gender, age, and native language [Chambers et al., 2013;Nerbonne, 2014;Seals and Shalin, 2023], which are pivotal in understanding identity and social affiliations [Ar”
From Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Nerbonne, 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boyd, R. L., & Schwartz, H. A. (2021) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x20967028 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
An integrated model of voice-user interface continuance intention: The gender effect
Nguyen, Q. N., Ta, A., & Prybutok, V. (2019) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1525023 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Large, D. R., Clark, L., Quandt, A., Burnett, G., & Skrypchuk, L. (2017) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2017.04.003 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Authorship Attribution in the Era of LLMs: Problems, Methodologies, and Challenges
Huang, B., Chen, C., & Shu, K. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3715073.3715076 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“…distinctively from lexical content words, revealing correlations with socio-cultural categories such as gender, age, and native language (Chambers et al., 2013, Nerbonne, 2014, Seals and Shalin, 2023), which are pivotal in understanding identity and social affiliations (Argamon et al., 2009).”
- Authors
- Nerbonne, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Nerbonne, J.
- ORCID
- Nerbonne, J.
- Venue
- Literary and Linguistic Computing
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-02-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-142
- ISSN
- 0268-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4615
- OpenAlex
- W2110372823
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Literary and Linguistic Computing (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Keywords
- function words, pronouns, stylometry, authorship attribution, personality traits, first-person singular pronouns, word frequency distribution, authorial style
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review