The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Actions and Events in Interval Temporal Logic
Abstract
We present a representation of events and action based on interval temporal logic that is significantly more expressive and more natural than most previous AI approaches. The representation is motivated by work in natural language semantics and discourse, temporal logic, and AI planning and plan recognition. The formal basis of the representation is presented in detail, from the axiomatization of time periods to the relationship between actions and events and their effects. The power of the representation is illustrated by applying it to the axiomatization and solution of several standard problems from the AI literature on action and change. An approach to the frame problem based on explanation closure is shown to be both powerful and natural when combined with our representational framework. We also discuss features of the logic that are beyond the scope of many traditional representations, and describe our approach to difficult problems such as external event! and simultaneous actions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals
Allen, J. F. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/182.358434 · Cited by 7,593 · cited 4×
“52 References[Allen, 1983] James F. Allen, \Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals," Commu-nications of the ACM, 26(11):832{843, 1983.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationSTRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving
Fikes, R. E., & Nilsson, N. J. (1971) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(71)90010-5 · Cited by 4,882
Cited by
Data Mining for Internet of Things: A Survey
Tsai, C.-W., Lai, C.-F., Chiang, M.-C., & Yang, L. T. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.103013.00206 · Cited by 620
Metadata
- Authors
- ALLEN, J. F., & FERGUSON, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Logic and Computation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 531-579
- ISSN
- 0955-792X (ISSN-L)
- 1465-363X
- OpenAlex
- W4246695531
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
