The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; its reference list is not available.
Evidence-Based Outcome Research: A practical guide to conducting randomized controlled trials for psychosocial interventions
Abstract
This online resource provides both conceptual and practical information for conducting and evaluating evidence-based outcome studies. It encompasses psychotherapy research for traditional mental health disorders (eg. depression, anxiety), as well as psychosocial-based treatments provided to medical patient populations to have impact either on the disease process itself (pain, cardiovascular risk) or to improve the quality of life of such individuals. The major emphasis is on the practical nuts-and-bolts implementation of psychosocial-based RCTs from conception to completion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The random selection of sessions was stratified according to therapist, phase of the intervention (early, middle or late) and phase of study recruitment (early, middle or late), as recommended in psychosocial interventions. 100”
From Acceptance and commitment therapy for older people with treatment-resistant generalised anxiety disorder: The FACTOID feasibility study (2021) · cites this paper as [100]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 126
Metadata
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2007-09
- OpenAlex
- W1580992623
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- randomized controlled trials, psychosocial interventions, depression, anxiety, pain, cardiovascular risk, quality of life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence-Based Outcome Research: A practical guide to conducting randomized controlled trials for psychosocial interventions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/med:psych/9780195304633.001.0001
- The paper
- Evidence-Based Outcome Research: A practical guide to conducting randomized controlled trials for psychosocial interventions. (2007). Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/med%3Apsych/9780195304633.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
