CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingFree Will and AgencyPhilosophical Ethics and Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Responsibility and psychopathy: Interfacing law, psychiatry and philosophy

·2010·Oxford University Press eBooks
DOI 10.1093/med/9780199551637.001.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The discussion of whether psychopaths are morally responsible for their behaviour has long taken place in philosophy, and in recent years this has moved into scientific and psychiatric investigation. This resource discusses this subject from both the philosophical and scientific disciplines, as well as a legal perspective.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/med/9780199551637.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
2010-08
DOI
10.1093/med/9780199551637.001.0001
OpenAlex
W2226127873
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.02
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
psychopathy, moral responsibility, criminal liability, philosophy of mind, psychiatry, legal responsibility, free will

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review