The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Educational leadership
Abstract
Effective leadership and management of educational organizations and activities are vital for the continued success and development of the processes by which existing and future doctors are educated. Poor leadership and weak management are two of the greatest contributors to organizational decline. It is essential to consider leadership and management somewhat separately. Although the two are interrelated and effective organizations need both, the specific skill sets involved in leadership and management are quite different. The chapter explores leadership and management theories, their chronology and how these theories relate to medical education. Taking an international perspective, the chapter will consider some of the skills, qualities, competences, perspectives and approaches that enable medical educators to lead and manage organizations and teams more effectively. Leadership is a hotly contested and ever-evolving concept, but it is when the theories translate into practical realities that educators can best use the vast range of guidance. Much of the literature derives from the business context, although there is an emerging body of research and writing on clinical and educational leadership in the medical and wider healthcare context. The literature relating to medical education focuses on both the clinical and the educational contexts, and this chapter draws on relevant theory and examples throughout. Finally, it is important to note that the literature on leadership has its academic roots in the social, behavioural, and management sciences. The evidence that is provided, the research methods utilized and the way in which leadership is discussed and conceptualized is different from that of some other educational topics, which draw more strongly from the natural sciences and positivist traditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cultural Ways of Learning: Individual Traits or Repertoires of Practice
Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032005019 · Cited by 2,161
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308326084 · Cited by 977
Classroom contexts for creativity
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014) · High Ability Studies · doi:10.1080/13598139.2014.905247 · Cited by 625
L2 grit: passion and perseverance for second-language learning
Teimouri, Y., Plonsky, L., & Tabandeh, F. (2022) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168820921895 · Cited by 503
Effective Schooling: Research, Theory and Practice
(1993) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/0924345930040304 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- McKimm, J., Cotton, P., Garden, A., & Needham, G.
- Venue
- Oxford Textbook of Medical Education
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-10
- Pages
- 722-736
- OpenAlex
- W2804932149
- Cited by
- 991
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 264.56
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Educational leadership. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/med/9780199652679.003.0061
- The paper
- McKimm, J., Cotton, P., Garden, A., & Needham, G. (2013). Educational leadership. Oxford Textbook of Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199652679.003.0061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.