The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Therapeutic Assessment with the MMPI-2 in Managed Health Care
Abstract
This chapter outlines a model of psychological assessment—Therapeutic Assessment—which collaboratively involves clients in framing assessment questions, interpreting test results, and tying test findings to their problems in living. While still in its early stages of development, Therapeutic Assessment with the MMPI-2 has been shown in controlled research to be highly beneficial to clients.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aschieri, F., & Smith, J. D. (2012) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.627964 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Finn, S. E., & Martin, H.
- ORCID
- Finn, Stephen E.
- Venue
- Personality Assessment in Managed Health Care
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1996-04
- Pages
- 131-152
- OpenAlex
- W2504177888
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- therapeutic assessment, MMPI-2, psychological assessment, managed care, client participation, collaborative assessment, test result interpretation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
