The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Primer on Psychotherapy Integration
Abstract
This chapter explicates the broad context of psychotherapy integration and sets the stage for the subsequent chapters in the volume. This chapter offers a primer on integration: in the dual sense of a primer (soft i) as a small introduction to the subject and of a primer (hard i) as a basecoat or undercoat for the following applications. This chapter begins by describing the converging reasons for the growth of psychotherapy integration, after which it reviewsfour predominant routes to integration. This segues into a brief consideration of the varieties of integration, which includes summaries of recent studies on the prevalence and subtypes of eclectic/integrative therapies. The chapter concludes with a discussion of recurrent obstacles to psychotherapy integration.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, integrative approaches, “characterized by dissatisfaction with single-school approaches and a concomitant desire to look across school boundaries to see what can be learned from other ways of conducting psychotherapy” in order “to enhance the efficacy, efficiency, and applicability of psychotherapy” (77) [p. 4], may prove useful in our future attempts to develop new, and improve”
From Waiting for a digital therapist: three challenges on the path to psychotherapy delivered by artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [77]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stawarz, K., Preist, C., Tallon, D., Wiles, N., & Coyle, D. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10120 · Cited by 198
Grodniewicz, J. P., & Hohol, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1190084 · Cited by 100
“…to see what can be learned from other ways of conducting psychotherapy” in order “to enhance the efficacy, efficiency, and applicability of psychotherapy” (77) [p. 4], may prove useful in our future attempts to develop new, and improve existing, therapeutic interventions delivered by CAIs.”
BackgroundHeinonen, E., & Orlinsky, D. E. (2013) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.814926 · Cited by 52
Intervention strategies and clinical process in transdiagnostic cognitive–behavioral therapy.
Boswell, J. F. (2013) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/a0032157 · Cited by 33
A hope intervention for adolescents: a randomized controlled trial delivered by paraprofessionals
Scioli, A., MacPherson, N., Murphy, R., Gooding, T., Love, M., Lyons, K. D., & Adachi-Mejia, A. M. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1528504 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Norcross, J. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Scranton (US)
- Corresponding author
- Norcross, John C.
- ORCID
- Norcross, John C.
- Venue
- Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2005-02
- Pages
- 3-23
- OpenAlex
- W2942290971
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 21.72
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- psychotherapy integration, eclectic therapy, integrative therapy, barriers to integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
