Managing Social Anxiety, Workbook: A Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Approach
Abstract
This revised online workbook is designed for patients' use as they work, either with a qualified mental health professional or on their own, to manage social anxiety. Based on the principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy, the treatment program described is evidence-based and proven effective. Complete with user-friendly forms and worksheets, as well as relatable case examples and chapter review questions, this guide contains all the tools necessary to help patients manage their anxiety and improve their quality of life.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People with social phobia often make thinking errors such as mind reading and fortune telling, which are attempts to reduce uncertainty about others' judgments and future social outcomes.
“Furthermore, individuals with social phobia often make thinking errors such as “mind reading” and “fortune telling” (Hope, Heimberg, & Turk, 2010), which represent attempts to decrease uncertainty regarding others' judgments and future social outcomes.”
From Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Common Factor in the Treatment of Emotional Disorders (2013) · cites this paper as Hope, Heimberg, & Turk, 2010
Cognitive behavioral therapy in group format is approximately as effective as individual cognitive behavioral therapy.
“CBT in group format is approximately as effective as individual CBT [17].”
Both treatments are well documented and have been implemented in scientific research before in treatment studies for GCBT and individual and group ST.
“Both treatments are well documented [17, 24, 75] and have been implemented in scientific research before in treatment studies for GCBT (e.g. [76–79]) and individual and group ST (e.g. [19, 43, 80, 81]).”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 14
- Authors
- Hope, D. A., Heimberg, R. G., & Turk, C. L.
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2010-05
- OpenAlex
- W4246000834
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- social anxiety, cognitive behavioral therapy, self-help, anxiety reduction, self-directed treatment, worksheets, quality of life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
