The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding the Emotional Disorders
Abstract
Understanding the Emotional Disorders: A Symptom-Based Approach examines replicable symptom dimensions contained within five adjacent diagnostic classes in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: depressive disorders, bipolar and related disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, and trauma- and stressor-related disorders. It reviews several problems and limitations associated with traditional, diagnosis-based approaches to studying psychopathology, and it establishes the theoretical and clinical value of analyzing specific types of symptoms within the emotional disorders. It demonstrates that several of these disorders—most notably, major depression, bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder—contain multiple symptom dimensions that clearly can be differentiated from one another. Moreover, these symptom dimensions are highly robust and generalizable and can be identified in multiple types of data, including self-ratings, semistructured interviews, and clinicians’ ratings. Furthermore, individual symptom dimensions often have strikingly different correlates, such as varying levels of criterion validity and diagnostic specificity. It concludes with the development of a more comprehensive, symptom-based model that subsumes various forms of psychopathology—including sleep disturbances, eating- and weight-related problems, personality pathology, psychosis/thought disorder, and hypochondriasis—beyond the emotional disorders.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nelson, G. H., O'Hara, M. W., & Watson, D. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22560 · Cited by 51
Self-citationMcCarthy-Jones, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01310 · Cited by 40
Perez, T. M., Glue, P., Adhia, D. B., Navid, M. S., Zeng, J., Dillingham, P., Smith, M., Niazi, I. K., Young, C. K., & De Ridder, D. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06863-z · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Watson, D., & O'Hara, M. W.
- ORCID
- Watson, David
- Venue
- Oxford Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2017-06
- OpenAlex
- W4249826006
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- emotional disorders, symptom dimensions, depressive disorders, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, trauma- and stressor-related disorders, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, diagnostic specificity, criterion validity, sleep disorders, eating disorders, personality pathology, psychosis, health anxiety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review