Cited by 8Musculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceOccupational Health and Performance

Feasibility of Training Physical Therapists to Implement a Psychologically Informed Physical Therapy Program for Deployed U.S. Sailors and Marines with Musculoskeletal Injuries

Weiser, Sherri, Lis, Angela, Ziemke, Gregg, Hiebert, Rudi, Faulkner, Danielle, Brennan, Tara, Iveson, Brian, Campello, Marco·2018·Military Medicine

Abstract

This study assesses the feasibility of training U.S. Navy Physical Therapy staff members (PT staff) aboard a U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier in psychologically informed physical therapy (PiPT). Training was conducted prior to deployment over 3 d and included background information, skills development, and application in the form of role playing and case studies. During deployment, nine phone conferences were conducted to reinforce training, assess skills, and discuss implementation. PiPT knowledge was assessed by a written test and role-playing skills. The adoption of the training was determined by analysis of clinical notes and verbal responses of the PT staff during phone conferences. There were two PT staff members on the carrier. Both received passing knowledge test scores and demonstrated role-playing proficiency. Clinical note assessment and discussions during conference calls also indicated successful implementation. The feasibility of training Navy PT staff to implement PiPT was demonstrated. PT staff successfully translated training into practice. This is significant, since PiPT has the potential to limit attrition due to musculoskeletal injuries in Navy personnel. Factors believed to be associated with the success of the training include adoption of the PiPT model by PT staff and reinforcement of changes in clinical practice during deployment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/milmed/usx229

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of clear competencies, rationale, framework, and clinical models that are feasible and acceptable makes it difficult to develop, adopt, and apply best practices for the spread and adoption of PiPT programs.

    “The lack of clear competencies, rationale, framework, and clinical models that are feasible and acceptable make it difficult to develop, adopt, and apply best practices for the spread and adoption of PiPT programs.22,23,31,33,36”

    From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Discussion identifies inadequate training, limited therapist acceptance, and difficulty shifting to a biopsychosocial approach as obstacles to implementing PiPT. It does not attribute those obstacles to a lack of clear competencies, rationale, frameworks, or feasible and acceptable clinical models, nor does it address best practices for wider spread and adoption. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Improved outcomes are more likely when physical, emotional, and existential strengths and challenges to well-being are concurrently addressed rather than focused exclusively on physical treatment.

    “Improved outcomes are more likely when physical, emotional, and existential strengths and challenges to well-being are concurrently addressed rather than focused exclusively on physical treatment.22-24”

    From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction says that combining psychological care with physical therapy reduces disability more than physical therapy alone in patients with subacute or chronic musculoskeletal injuries. It also links cognitive and emotional responses to pain outcomes. It does not address existential strengths or challenges, and its findings about pain-related disability do not establish improved well-being generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ: "Decade of the Flags" Working Group: early identification and management of psychological risk factors ("Yellow flags") in patients with low back pain: a reap- praisal. PhysTher 2011; 91(5): 737-53.
  2. Hofmann SG: An Introduction to Modern CBT: Psychological Solutions to Mental Health Problems. John Wiley & Sons, 2011. Available at https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/16974595-introduction-to-modern- cbt; accessed February 27, 2017.

Authors
Weiser, S., Lis, A., Ziemke, G., Hiebert, R., Faulkner, D., Brennan, T., Iveson, B., & Campello, M.
Affiliations
  • New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • Naval Medical Center Portsmouth (US)
Venue
Military Medicine
Published
2018-03-01
Volume
183
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
503-509
ISSN
  • 0026-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-613X
OpenAlex
W2795401994
Cited by
8
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Military Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs (W81XWH-14-2-0146)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
Keywords
musculoskeletal injuries, military deployment, Navy personnel, physiotherapy education, aircraft carriers, attrition, role play, training implementation
MeSH terms
Behavioral Medicine, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Naval Medicine, United States, Universities, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Physical Therapy Modalities, Young Adult, Physical Therapists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review