CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10Philosophy, Ethics, and ExistentialismMedieval and Classical PhilosophyReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

HESTER PANIM IN MODERN JEWISH THOUGHT

Wolpe, D.·1997·Modern Judaism
DOI 10.1093/mj/17.1.25
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

David Wolpe; HESTER PANIM IN MODERN JEWISH THOUGHT*, Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience, Volume 17, Issue 1, 1 February 1997, Pages 25–56

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mj/17.1.25

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Wolpe, D.
Affiliations
Jewish Theological Seminary (US)
Corresponding author
Wolpe, D.
Venue
Modern Judaism
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1997-01-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
25-56
ISSN
  • 0276-1114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1086-3273
DOI
10.1093/mj/17.1.25
OpenAlex
W1971081428
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Medieval and Classical Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
Keywords
Jewish philosophy, Jewish women, women in Judaism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review